Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Source: N. Korea Says Has Nukes
Yahoo News ^ | 10/16/02 | George Gedda - AP

Posted on 10/16/2002 6:53:31 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

U.S. Source: N. Korea Says Has Nukes
Wed Oct 16, 7:51 PM ET

By GEORGE GEDDA, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - North Korea (news - web sites) has told the United States it has a secret nuclear weapons program in violation of an agreement signed with the Clinton administration, a senior administration official said Wednesday night.

North Korea also told U.S. diplomats it no longer beholden to the anti-nuclear agreement, said the official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The disclosure, which stunned senior administration officials, is certain to chill U.S.-North Korean relations. President Bush (news - web sites) had labeled the country part of the "axis of evil" — along with Iraq and Iran — but hopes were raised that the reclusive nation wanted to build international ties when Bush sent Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly to Pyongyang for security talks.

Kelly visited North Korea on Oct. 3-5 and demanded that the communist state address global concerns about its nuclear and other weapons programs.

In response, the Pyongyang government accused Bush's special envoy of making "threatening remarks." The United States refused all comment on the dicussions,

Under a 1994 agreement with the United States, North Korea promised to give up its nuclear weapons program, and it promised to allow inspections to verify that it did not have the material needed to construct such weapons.

But it has yet to allow the inspections, drawing criticism from the Bush administration.

The source said Kelly also raised with North Korea evidence that North Korea may have a uranimum-enrichment program. The program, which the United States believes would only be used to develop a nuclear bomb, began under the Clinton administration, according to the official.

Surprisingly, North Korea confirmed the allegation.

The administration has not decided how to respond. "We're going to keep talking," the official said.

After months of tension with South Korea (news - web sites), the North resumed high-level talks in August that restarted stalled reconciliation efforts on the Korean peninsula — divided by the most heavily armed border in the world.

The Koreas were divided after World War II and remained that way at the end of the inconclusive Korean War from 1950-53. About 37,000 U.S. troops are stationed in South Korea as a deterrent against the North.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gotnukes; northkorea; nukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: theDentist
Nice picture. Who's the tool in the hat ?
21 posted on 10/16/2002 7:36:49 PM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast
No, I think, in that case, we'll be hustling to his site to feel his pain!
22 posted on 10/16/2002 7:41:07 PM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Under a 1994 agreement with the United States, North Korea promised to give up its nuclear weapons program, and it promised to allow inspections to verify that it did not have the material needed to construct such weapons.

What a great president that Bill Clinton was. </approriate tag>

23 posted on 10/16/2002 7:43:13 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
I'll bite.
24 posted on 10/16/2002 7:43:47 PM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
How does a North Korean nuke get to Iraq?

Practice, practice, practice.

My apologies to Henny Youngman

25 posted on 10/16/2002 7:44:41 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
I'll bite.
26 posted on 10/16/2002 7:45:35 PM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
I don't know his name, but he's high up in thge NK gov't.

Probably another long-lost brother.

27 posted on 10/16/2002 7:45:53 PM PDT by theDentist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: FreeReign
Its interesting these are the SAME "tough" inspections being demanded by our French, Russian, and Chinese friends. I wouldn't be surprised after a few such inspections to find out Saddam has nukes after all. Basically there's the case for attacking Iraq in the absence of ANY inspections, period. We simply cannot afford to be fooled twice. Its bad enough Bubba had us bamboozled by other member of the Axis Of Evil.
29 posted on 10/16/2002 7:46:39 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Properly phrased:

How does a North Korean nuke get to Iraq now that Bush is President?

hmmmm...errrr he doesn't.

30 posted on 10/16/2002 7:48:44 PM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The disclosure, which stunned senior administration officials, is certain to chill U.S.-North Korean relations.

"stunned" :-?

I wonder how much longer Tenet can last at the CIA ? He should have been gone long ago. Our intelligence machine needs some work, Im afraid.
31 posted on 10/16/2002 7:59:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
they may have alot now..and the missles to deliver them

Deliver them where? What's in range?

32 posted on 10/16/2002 8:00:50 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Well, just to explore how much fun baseless speculation can be...

How about the DC sniper (olive-skin? small stature?) as a PRK agent?

Montgomery County is chock-full of Koreans. Easy to blend in. North Korean Intelligence has a long history of inscrutable, messed-up stuff. Blew up a South Korean Airliner before the Seoul Olympics in hopes of disrupting them.
33 posted on 10/16/2002 8:02:39 PM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If cement has been laid on the nuclear reactors Clinton gave them, bomb them to rubble now. A deal's a deal. Break it, and we break you.
34 posted on 10/16/2002 8:05:22 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Not_Who_U_Think
I think, if truth be known, that more was said than "yes, we have it." There is a point to this admission.

Agreed. They are saying: "We know you are going to change the regime in Iraq. We know you have identified us as a member of the axis of evil. Don't change our regime. We have nukes. We will use them."

The message is pretty clear, no?

35 posted on 10/16/2002 8:17:17 PM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: templar
Deliver them where? What's in range?

1000km - Japan and, of course, South Korea are in range.

36 posted on 10/16/2002 8:37:51 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: coulson
That is indeed the right question - not the fact, which anybody with half a brain knew was in the cards from the day of Clinton's capitulation-deal years ago, but the admission of the fact. There are two obvious possible explanations for the willingness to state it for the record.

The first is that they are trying to stop digging deeper in the hole they are in. There are signs of this in economic policy changes, contacts with South Korea, releasing Japanese abductees. Which may be trying to get off the axis of evil hit parade, and may be a sign that the internal famine etc is so bad they know they have to do something fairly drastic, very soon. This is the optimistic reading of the admission.

The other possibility, less hopeful than the previous, is that the admission simply means they are done. And having a bomb in hand, believe they have the deterrence capability to protect continuation of the program from direct military action. That they want to use it as a diplomatic bargaining chip, but as an accomplished fact. To bargain with it they have to admit it, obviously.

A slight possible twist here is they may want the bargaining or deterring effect, without actually having finished - i.e. that it is a bluff. But I consider that less likely than the other two.

For what it is worth...

37 posted on 10/16/2002 9:44:54 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: templar
Deliver them where? What's in range?

About a year and a half ago a Korean missile test dropped its last stage offshore California. Whats in range? What isn't!

38 posted on 10/16/2002 10:12:38 PM PDT by American in Israel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson