[groanup]

How would you introduce the military into domestic law enforcement if that was your goal? What calamity would you create to necessitate the need for military interdiction into local law enforcement activities? I am not a conspiracy nut, hate that s##t as a matter of fact, but this seems a little to convenient. More people have died in automobile accidents in the four counties in the last ten days than have died at the hands of a sniper. This is a reason to tickle with the law against military police action?

[big'ol_freeper]

Give me a break. You might want to consume a bit less caffeine my friend.

[DWPittelli]

How would you introduce the military into domestic law enforcement if that was your goal?... this seems a little too convenient. More people have died in automobile accidents in the four counties in the last ten days than have died at the hands of a sniper. This is a reason to tickle with the law against military police action?

Yes, it is.

Even apart from the possibility (probability?) of jihadist connections, what kind of civil liberties requirement says that military sniper-locators must not be used to catch a mass-murdering sniper? An insane one.