Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What a turn of events ...
1 posted on 10/15/2002 4:52:14 PM PDT by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 11th_VA
The news report I just heard on the radio basically said that a witness has described the shooter as someone with a "slight build" and of either "Middle Eastern" or "Hispanic". I'm thinking "terrorist"!
2 posted on 10/15/2002 4:57:34 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
Law enforcement officials have not said they suspect anyone from the services. Experts have said the shooter also could be a hunter, a target shooter, someone with law enforcement experience, and so on.

CNN - About 1/2 hour ago, said they're "looking for a man that's Hispanic or Middle Eastern, and drives....."(then they showed the pictures of the vans).
I said to my spouce: "Did you hear that part? The part about the man being Hispanic or Middle Eastern?" He said "no", he "missed that part."
They said it quick.
I'm suprised the press isn't even SUGGESTING Middle Eastern terrorism. Does anyone else find that odd? They're not even asking!

4 posted on 10/15/2002 5:00:20 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
That's not all they're up to. Based on the governor's ban on shooting in the areas hit by the "Beltway Sniper", I think there's a good chance that they're deploying a ShotSpotter(tm) system in the area. The Pentagon has other surveillance resources at its disposal as well, items that civilian law enforcement agencies can't afford.

This killing must be stopped, and I'll be the good guys will try just about anything by now.

5 posted on 10/15/2002 5:00:38 PM PDT by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
Since when is fighting enemy troops on our own soil considered domestic law enforcement?
6 posted on 10/15/2002 5:01:00 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
How would you introduce the military into domestic law enforcement if that was your goal? What calamity would you create to necessitate the need for military interdiction into local law enforcement activities? I am not a conspiracy nut, hate that s##t as a matter of fact, but this seems a little to convenient. More people have died in automobile accidents in the four counties in the last ten days than have died at the hands of a sniper. This is a reason to tickle with the law against military police action?
7 posted on 10/15/2002 5:02:26 PM PDT by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
Asked whether there were links to al-Qaida or other foreign terrorists, Ridge said, "I don't think we can foreclose that. Certainly, nobody in the FBI or the White House has foreclosed that."

I'm impressed.

8 posted on 10/15/2002 5:02:30 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
The aircraft would perform general reconnaissance, such as looking for or tracking the light-colored van authorities say was seen at one or more of the shooting sites.

A gazillion of these vehicles and from 10,000 feet the military can figure out which one?

Pentagon participation also could involve a system of sensors that could detect flashes of gunfire on the ground, the official said.

Like at Waco?

9 posted on 10/15/2002 5:07:12 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
White House Concedes Sniper May Be Foreign Terrorist

another thread

10 posted on 10/15/2002 5:07:43 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
Pentagon participation also could involve a system of sensors that could detect flashes of gunfire on the ground, the official said.

But, but, but... I thought these sensors didn't work. The Danforth comittee on Waco tells us that what looks just like a burst from a gun is actually light bouncing off of ground litter. Of course, the ground litter, in this strange phenomenon, is always locted right next to a man with a gun, so maybe it would still be useful.

13 posted on 10/15/2002 5:33:53 PM PDT by agrandis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
How come the powers that be can shred the Posse Comitatus Act over the deaths of a handfull of Washingtonians without batting an eye, yet when it is suggested the military be used to secure the borders, the wailing is long and loud?
19 posted on 10/15/2002 7:32:28 PM PDT by Mensch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
I don't think this will help very much, besides the obvious Constitutional issues.

What would make sense (and what I hope is happening behind the scenes) would be for actual snipers from our military to advise the cops.

I'm sure a real-life sniper could go to one of these malls and automatically think: "hey, if I was operating here, I would shoot from behind that hedge . . . " etc.

This could be much more useful that surveillance photos.

25 posted on 10/16/2002 9:57:08 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson