Pro-American Facts

unclesam.blogspot.com ^ | 2002/10/11 | Uncle Sam

[Mr. Mojo]

I don't like labor unions either; they're corrupt to the core. But (most) union members are not communists. That word is used way too loosely these days.

[adam stevens]

Whatever the members believe the goal of labor unions and their bosses is communism.

How would you define a communist?

[Mr. Mojo]

I already mentioned it....it's where the gov't controls the means of production. Individual companies do not exist.

[adam stevens]

That seems to me to be what the Dimorats want.

[Mr. Mojo]

Some, but not most.

[Non-Sequitur]

bumb

[whattajoke]

This must be a planted story. It's simply ridiculous and any sane conservative/GOP'er would regard it as such. Please don't fall prey to it!

[truenospinzone]

Fist off, once does not equal "several times", particularly when your intro post stated "many of you may disagree with his solution" as opposed to "many of us" or "myself included".

Secondly, it is absolutely ridiculous to state that most Democrats are communists. That word means absolutely nothing now that the vast majority of the people that use it think that "communist" means "anyone who disagrees with me politically". Frankly, at this point you may as well be using the terms "boogeyman" or "Keyser Soze"; you'd have just as much credibility. Ditto with the statement that "Democrats love terrorists". Almost every mainstream conservative American has a friend or relative who is a Democrat, and when some extremist nut comes along to tell them that their frat buddy or Aunt Edna loves terrorists, they aren't going to fall all over themselves to support that person. Making ANY of these statements is political suicide, because most people see that kind of posturing as the vapid "My political party is a football team - Repubs Rool Democrats Drool!" immaturity that it is.

There are many, many reasons to disapprove of the Democratic Party and what it is doing to this country. Focus on them, and lay off the ridiculous ad hominem.

[Britton J Wingfield]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=20649

http://www.amaweb.org/election2000/muslim_voters_florida.htm

http://www.atr.org/opeds/tas/tas0601.htm

http://www.islamicinstitute.org/Ealert11062000.asp

[adam stevens]

My apologies. I do not agree with Uncle Sam's proposals.

[adam stevens]

Thank you!

[Travelgirl]

You might want to add "white haters".

[calenel]

I disagree that Muslims favor the Democrats as they tend to vote Republican (as mentioned above), however I will suggest that maybe al-Qaeda favors the Democrats, somehow recognizing what too many Americans do not - that many of the policies espoused by the Democratic Party are bad for America.

The basis for this suggestion is this:

30% of all potential voters are registered Democrats, the rest being either registered with another party (GOP, Libertarians, etc.) or unregistered.

All of the Buffalo al-Qaeda cell that were US citizens were registered Democrats (five).

The odds of picking one person at random and having them turn up registered Democrat is 30%, two for two is 9%... and five for five is one quarter of 1% (.0025).


I wonder what the party registrations of the Seattle al-Qaeda cell members are.

[EverOnward]

Thank you so very much for putting me on your ping list. Bless you.

[rmlew]

Lets see in on the fifth.

[adam stevens]

BUMP!

[adam stevens]

You are welcome!

[Uncle Miltie]

There is no party registration in Washington. However the Seattle Al-Quaida was roundly praised by the King County Executive Ron Simms. I believe he won awards from county Govt. Simms is, of course, a Democrat.

As I'm sure you know, the Oregon Al-Quaida involved former interns to the Mayor of Portland, a (you guessed it!) Democrat.

Add in Lockwana, and you've got at least seven Al-Quadacrats with known political affiliation, all anti-Americans, all Democrats. You connect the dots.