[erikm88]

there was a unofficial web-poll done by one of the local ABC stations here in Columbia, MO. The question was who would you vote for, for Senate? It was Talent - 69%, Carnahan - 41%.

Not that this was scientific by any means, but it was interesting nonetheless.

--erik

[Teacher317]

there was a unofficial web-poll done by one of the local ABC stations here in Columbia, MO. The question was who would you vote for, for Senate? It was Talent - 69%, Carnahan - 41%.
Not that this was scientific by any means, but it was interesting nonetheless.

I'd say that was interesting... ABC is predicting 110% voter turnout! Who says the networks won't report on Democratic election fraud? ;^)

[RobFromGa]

Yeah, and at tleast this poll includes the 10% dead people expected to vote.

[Agamemnon]

It was Talent - 69%, Carnahan - 41%.

While I love the fact that Talent is comfortably ahead, and I've heard of people giving 110%, it's only been until now that I've ever seen that effort put into practice.

[tall_tex]

69+41=110%, now we know the number of dead folks that they expect to vote for the rats. ha

[teeman8r]

voter fraud is rampant in MO... even the polls show that the dead vote... about 10% of them...

there was a unofficial web-poll done by one of the local ABC stations here in Columbia, MO. The question was who would you vote for, for Senate? It was Talent - 69%, Carnahan - 41% ---totalling 110%!!!

[Redleg Duke]

Had to have been a RAT poll...it tallies 110%!

[LexBaird]

there was a unofficial web-poll done by one of the local ABC stations here in Columbia, MO. The question was who would you vote for, for Senate? It was Talent - 69%, Carnahan - 41%.

Not that this was scientific by any means, but it was interesting nonetheless.

Especially since this adds up to 110%. Must be all of those dead people who vote in St. Louis making up the extra votes.