Seems reasonable to me.
To: shrinkermd
boo-birds I was thinking of something a tad stronger than that.
"Our Party whines and whines,"
Getting better...
Seems reasonable to me
Yeppers!
To: shrinkermd
For pubbies (and I'm one, BTW) to take control of the Seante and keep the HOuse, republican voters will have to exercise their sovereign DUTY and VOTE.
We have seen what the despotic democrats want to do to the SCOTUS (make it into an extension of the party just as they have the NJSC) and only control over the U.S.Senate will change the degenerate path our legal environment has taken under democrat control. [May I remind everyone that sinkEmperor clintoon fired the vast majority of federal prosecutors and loaded the offices with complicit democrat shills, thus insuring his henchpeople of special treatment when indicted or pursued.]
This mid-term election is absolutely about whom will be seated on the Supreme Court in the next few years. Do conservatives want more of Ginsberg and the other 'activist' judges? NO, but to prevent such these conservatives MUST vote the rat despots out of office.
You will read, over and over, the mantra of democrats 'protecting a woman's right to choose'. WE must finish the specious sentence and point out that a right to hire a serial killer to murder the unborn is hardly a good thing for women or the Republic. We will read that the democrats want to protect social security, implying (but mostly asserting) that republicans don't want to protect social security. Such LIES must be met with facts and these facts must be administered person to person, conservative to democrat auto voters whom we all know, at work, at home, and at play.
This mid-term election is possibly even more crucial to the future of this Republic than the 2000 election was. Can anyone even imagine how screwed we'd be if goreghoul had won in 2000? we must get Daschle out of his despotic RULE over the Senate, to rid our nation of the corrosive socialist like Leahy and Biden and clinton and Harkin and Wellstone and Boxer and ... well, you all know the usual culprits who champion serial killing of the unborn and block even a floor vote on judgeships of less liberal people.
3 posted on
10/12/2002 7:19:33 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
To: shrinkermd
Conservatives on the court are reluctant to leave, fearing it would result in a left-leaning bench. But if Bush can get his appointees confirmed by the Senate, they might feel comfortable in stepping down. This would push the High Court even further to the right.How does it push SCOTUS "even farther to the right" (as if it were already right) if conservative justices retire and are replaced with conservative justices?? Besides, I'm not so sure Bush would nominate people I would consider conservative.
To: shrinkermd
bump
5 posted on
10/12/2002 7:22:16 PM PDT by
Liz
To: shrinkermd
There's still a few weeks to go, so things could change. But it looks hopeful at the moment.
It's very important that everyone should get out and vote. And it's also important that no one should waste their votes this year on third-party candidates. There's too much at stake, especially judicial appointments.
6 posted on
10/12/2002 7:27:42 PM PDT by
Cicero
To: shrinkermd
I thought it amusing that the dems held their long-awaited economic summit on one of the most bullish days of the year. While they were busy whining about the economy, the market was rising -- almost certainly because of the war resolution.
8 posted on
10/12/2002 7:35:17 PM PDT by
js1138
To: shrinkermd
Things are so tight this year that any close races could easily be decided by some of those strange coincidences that often accompany Democrat victories:
- lost ballot boxes
- unusual numbers of spoiled ballots
- duplicate votes being cast
- votes cast by people not living in the precinct, or not living at all
If you're a Republican and you live in a district where the election might be close you should contact your local Republican party (go here for more information) to see how you can be a poll monitor and make sure the election is 100% clean.
9 posted on
10/12/2002 7:42:10 PM PDT by
oct11
To: shrinkermd
One big reason for our counter-intuitive conclusion is that the Republicans have a highly successful dirty-tricks squad assisting their cause -- the Democrats themselves. By demanding that Bush take Iraq to Congress, a losing issue for the Democrats, they have now become the Stupid Party.
11 posted on
10/12/2002 7:46:59 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: shrinkermd
If we take both Houses of Congress and Chaffee doesn't pull a Jeffords, I'll donate $100 to FR and dance like a chicken in class.
Of course I desperately WANT it to happen, but I just don't see the Dems failing to cheat enough to prevent it.
To: shrinkermd
Interesting article... However the author did not do himself any favors by claiming that it was three Demo senators who went on the foolish trip to Iraq
A recent trip by three Senate liberals to Baghdad turned into a public-relations nightmare for the Democrats, leaving voters with the impression that the party is divided on the issue of war and soft on terrorists.
To: shrinkermd
I would love to see Mary Landrieu booted out of the Senate
toute suiteAnd after she loses, then
laissez les bons temps roulez!
17 posted on
10/12/2002 8:11:29 PM PDT by
Siobhan
To: shrinkermd
Franklin Roosevelt in 1934 and Bill Clinton in 1998. Actually in 1994 (Clinton's first midterm election) Republican's managed to take BOTH houses away from the Democrats.
To: shrinkermd
I like Barrons and hope they are correct with their prognostications re a double Pubbie win. Get out the conservative voters by any means and defeat the RATS! They constantly prove how depraved and unethical they are. We must defeat them!
To: shrinkermd
This article makes no sense. It says, "If the GOP fails to unseat Democrat incumbent Jean Carnahan, it's unlikely it will fulfill our prediction and take back control of the Senate.". But the overall prediction is a 52-48 Republican Senate. So there should still be a Repulican majority even if Carnahan holds Missouri.
Overall, the Senate prediction seems more based on wishful thinking and quotes from Republican insiders (why none from Democrat insiders?), than on objective analysis.
To: shrinkermd
Everything has gone well in Maryland for the Republicans," says Morgan. This is like man bites dog.
The GOP gains in both houses predicted in this article is possible, but my gut tells me it's not going to happen that way.
26 posted on
10/12/2002 8:33:56 PM PDT by
lasereye
To: shrinkermd
This article is a little too good.
To: firebrand; StarFan; Dutchy; stanz; RaceBannon; Doctor Raoul; Neets; evilC; Black Agnes; Cacique; ...
Interesting article ping! Let's hope there will be a GOP sweep on November 5!
33 posted on
10/15/2002 9:18:21 AM PDT by
nutmeg
To: shrinkermd
I read articles like this and then I look at my own congressional district - Kansas 3rd - and I see the GOP doing nothing to help Adam Taff win a district which by rights should be Republican. And I then realize that until we are as serious at this as the Democrats are then we won't pick up seats in the House and probably not in the Senate, either.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson