Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Congressman Billybob
Shutting off nonsense like this in all future elections concerning the House, the Senate, and the President is an important function for the Court.

Congressman-

What form would the SCOTUS ruling take that would shut off this nonsense in future elections?

I don't get it. The NJSC re-wrote a state law that was clear. What ruling by SCOTUS will stop a similar future State SC from doing the exact same thing?

153 posted on 10/11/2002 10:58:56 AM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: RobFromGa
A scathing opinion pointing that out.
155 posted on 10/11/2002 11:00:33 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
If the US SC says that state courts CANNOT rewrite their own state's election laws, that shuts off ALL such cases. And, since the US Constitution gives power over election laws to "the legislatures of the states," the US SC has a good reason to rule that way.

If you have any doubts on the subject, read the concurring opinion of the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia and Thomas in Bush-Gore, Round II. They spell it out in plain English.

Billybob

188 posted on 10/11/2002 3:37:14 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson