All you are doing is reposting old posts and telling me to not believe my lying eyes. If you would actually stand by what post #251 you wouldn't be afraid to answer my questions.
I stand firmly behind post 251. That's why I keep posting it. How silly of you to proclaim from on high (or low, depending on perspective) that if I don't cater to you and your questions I don't stand behind post 251. Further more, afraid of you? HA!! You're a documented pipsqueak. And deserve nothing but scorn. Like the judge, jury and executioner at a Medieval Inquisition.
Zon: I will not answer your questions. 333
Checkmate. You can't answer my question because you know it'll force you to lie.
I don't lie, not even to a person like you that is deserving of nothing but scorn. Which is nothing compared to many people (identified in post 251) who in the name of fun and love routinely lie to their own children -- flying reindeer towing Santa Clause being the most repeated lie, followed by Easter bunny and tooth fairy. See what I mean about you being like the judge, jury and executioner at a Star Chamber Inquisition; you have great desire to force me to lie. What happens if I continue to stand behind post 251, are you going to burn me at the stake.
Quick lesson on what is and what isn't a lie. Person A asks person B what day of the week it is. Person B responds, "it's Tuesday". Unbeknownst to person B it is actually Wednesday. Person B made an error not a lie. Example 2: Person C asks person D what day of the week it is. Person D, knowing it's actually Wednesday responds, "it's Tuesday". Person D told a lie.
Why the above explanation? To clarify that for the vast majority of parents and people that inject the non-reality/mysticism supernatural God concept into children's minds, they're not telling a lie, For they actually believe the concept to be valid; they would be Person B in the above example. On the other hand, parents that inject the non-realities/mysticism of the other three -- flying reindeer towing (Santa Clause), Easter bunny, tooth fairy -- are telling a lie. For they do know that none of those three exist in reality; they would be person D in the above example.
You're a lying atheist with no guts to back his words, I'm happy we are on the polar ends of the scale.
I'm not an atheist due to a technical concern. It's way over your head so I won't bother trying to explain. For discussion purposes I'll accept the atheist label. I stand by words each time I repost post 251. I further backed post 251 with post 327. You just can't stand it that I'm not bowing before you: the judge, jury and executioner at your "Medieval Inquisition".
I don't want your respect, like I said, you are a liar that won't back up his words.
I repeat, I stand by words each time I repost post 251. I further backed post 251 with post 327.
then you accuse me of saying you meant only Christians, nowhere did I say you meant only Christians.
I told you in post 331, regarding your false claims: "Post 326 was thorough and also my final post regarding your false claims in post 272, 276, 277 and 317 (all four reposted above) and your dishonesty in dealing with them." In post 326 I particular like the analogy of you and the Washington Post writer.
If I took it out of context then answer my questions so your context will be clear. You can't answer my questions because you know it will further prove you as a liar, as if there wasn't enough proof already.
The context is clear without answering your questions, you admit that below. See below.
Zon: Clearly the context of post 251 (reposted below) is the group. The group identified is: any person and all persons that partake in injecting one of the four non-realities/mysticism into other people's minds; the four non-realities/mysticism are (1) flying reindeer towing a fat man (Santa Clause), (2) Easter bunny, (3) tooth fairy and (4) supernatural God. Common-sense logic is that the group can be categorized into several subgroups, which I never did categorize any subgroups because I chose the context to be the whole group. 333
That answer my simple questions to clarify (as if post #251 wasn't clear enough).
You admit that post 251 is clear enough. You've known that all along. Thus there's no need to answer your questions. Which is precisely why I chose not to. That I wouldn't dignify you by answering your questions is irrelevant and at best secondary. It's obvious that you're on a witch hunt and that you've found your victim (a victim that never hid and always stood in plain "view") and have proceeded to be judge, jury and executioner of your "Medieval Inquisition".
In this battle beteen a Christian and an atheist, it's clear who is the one that won't back up his words. Post #251 clearly says that those that teach their kids of a supernatural God commit "hideous child abuse". You've spent the last half of this thread telling everyone not to believe their lying eyes. The morality of atheism is taking a hammering on this thread.
I backed post 251 with post 327. BTW, this thread is not 500 posts in length (not even close to it) and your "Medieval Inquisition" didn't start until after I posted post 251. Your atheist issue is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. There's many people that aren't atheists and many that are atheists that inject into the innocent and formative young minds of little children the three non-realities/mysticism -- flying reindeer towing (Santa Clause), Easter bunny and tooth fairy. People that do that are intentionally lying to young children with the intent to deceive the child. As you said, "as if post #251 wasn't clear enough". Many people rationalize that the deception is good because it's done in the name of fun and love. They throw honest principle out the window. For an in-depth treatment see post 327.
The three questions deal directly with post #251. You won't answer my questions because you're trying to portray yourself as not saying that Christians are mystics.
Further more, afraid of you?
You're getting careless again. I said you're afraid to answer my questions.
I don't lie, not even to a person like you that is deserving of nothing but scorn. Which is nothing compared to many people (identified in post 251) who in the name of fun and love routinely lie to their own children -- flying reindeer towing Santa Clause being the most repeated lie, followed by Easter bunny and tooth fairy.
You forgot one, the teaching of a supernatural God. You're getting careless again.
See what I mean about you being like the judge, jury and executioner at a Star Chamber Inquisition; you have great desire to force me to lie. What happens if I continue to stand behind post 251, are you going to burn me at the stake.
You're burning yourself at the stake by not standing by your atheist philosophy. I've caught you in an inconsistency. You atheists are always accusing Christians of inconsistancies, but now you can't back up your words in post #251 by answering my questions.
Quick lesson on what is and what isn't a lie. Person A asks person B what day of the week it is. Person B responds, "it's Tuesday". Unbeknownst to person B it is actually Wednesday. Person B made an error not a lie.
So are you saying that you made an error when you said that those that teach of a supernatural God practice mysticism?
Why the above explanation? To clarify that for the vast majority of parents and people that inject the non-reality/mysticism supernatural God concept into children's minds, they're not telling a lie, For they actually believe the concept to be valid;...
Error or not, are they committing child abuse? In post #251, you said they were.
For they do know that none of those three exist in reality; they would be person D in the above example.
So the only ones that qualifies for your child abuse charge are the God worshippers who also do the other three. Most Christians do the other three along with their teachings of a supernatural God, so are you going to be consistant and say they they are committing child abuse like you said in post #251?
I'm not an atheist due to a technical concern. It's way over your head so I won't bother trying to explain.
You put all this importance on the teaching of Santa Claus and you want to say something is over my head? LOL
For discussion purposes I'll accept the atheist label. I stand by words each time I repost post 251. I further backed post 251 with post 327. You just can't stand it that I'm not bowing before you: the judge, jury and executioner at your "Medieval Inquisition".
I'm testing you for consistancy. You fail.
I repeat, I stand by words each time I repost post 251. I further backed post 251 with post 327.
Then answer my questions. Those that don't have faith in their philosophy are afraid of questions.
I told you in post 331, regarding your false claims: "Post 326 was thorough and also my final post regarding your false claims in post 272, 276, 277 and 317 (all four reposted above) and your dishonesty in dealing with them." In post 326 I particular like the analogy of you and the Washington Post writer.
What the Washington post writer said was a lie though, because not all Dems were stalling. All Christians believe in a supernatural God.
The context is clear without answering your questions, you admit that below. See below.
Yep you clearly said that those that teach of a supernatural God are guilty of child abuse. Therefore you meant all Christians are guilty of child abuse. Therefore I was right in attacking the atheist governments policy of genocide in the 20th century. It is a relevent topic.
You admit that post 251 is clear enough.
Yep and you said that Christians are guilty of child abuse.
You've known that all along. Thus there's no need to answer your questions. Which is precisely why I chose not to. That I wouldn't dignify you by answering your questions is irrelevant and at best secondary. It's obvious that you're on a witch hunt and that you've found your victim (a victim that never hid and always stood in plain "view") and have proceeded to be judge, jury and executioner of your "Medieval Inquisition".
Atheist governments committed the worst atrocities of the 20th century.
I backed post 251 with post 327. BTW, this thread is not 500 posts in length (not even close to it) and your "Medieval Inquisition" didn't start until after I posted post 251. Your atheist issue is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. There's many people that aren't atheists and many that are atheists that inject into the innocent and formative young minds of little children the three non-realities/mysticism -- flying reindeer towing (Santa Clause), Easter bunny and tooth fairy. People that do that are intentionally lying to young children with the intent to deceive the child. As you said, "as if post #251 wasn't clear enough". Many people rationalize that the deception is good because it's done in the name of fun and love. They throw honest principle out the window. For an in-depth treatment see post 327.
Are you going to press the government to press charges against Christians for their "hideous child abuse" that you accused them of in post #251?