To: BigWaveBetty; JeanS; schmelvin; MJY1288; terilyn; Ryle; MozartLover; Teacup; rdb3; fivekid; ...
Bump!
2 posted on
10/10/2002 2:11:56 AM PDT by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
2010 sounds like such a long time, but I guess it isn't. They day I can flip off the arabs and their oil, is the day the world will be just a little better. Can't wait.
3 posted on
10/10/2002 2:34:35 AM PDT by
paul544
To: MadIvan
You are correct. Cold fusion should be investigated, too.
In the UK in the 6/2/02 Times there was an article confirming the original findings.
The article was, of course, removed in the issues sent to the US.
REASON: The US State Dept and Sen Biden are determined,
with others, to keep the US dependent upon oil,
despite the Constitution and Congressional requirements
for encouraging inventors.
To: MadIvan
"We should be working on fuel cells as a matter of defence priority." Where do you get the idea the fuel cells are NOT being worked on?? All the major auto companies are working on them, as are many different US government agencies, including various ones in the DOD.
To: MadIvan
Hydrogen in elemental form is simply a storage medium...made by some vast energy source at a central location.
So, unless you use the current ultimate source of fuel cell hydrogen, petroleum,
We are still after that energy source.
To: MadIvan
How fitting that Ford, which revolutionised cars the first time with the creation of the Model T, is planning to do so again with this. And this revolution will help us be the eventual winners in the war on terror. You Sir, are so right on. If my wife and I make it back to London next summer I would love to get to meet you in person.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson