Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

G.O.P. Inquiry Lists Gifts to Clintons in White House
The New York Times ^ | 10/10/2002 | RAYMOND HERNANDEZ

Posted on 10/09/2002 7:27:27 PM PDT by Pokey78

WASHINGTON, Oct. 9 — Denise Rich, Malcolm S. Forbes, Nelson Mandela and other friends and supporters of the Clintons showered the couple with roughly $1 million in previously unreported gifts during the Clinton presidency, according to documents released by Republican Congressional investigators.

The gifts vary from tens of thousands of dollars in jewelry, rugs and furnishings to a $90,000 framed handwritten letter by President Harry S. Truman, a $10,000 Mickey Mantle trading card from 1952 and nine rare books, including a six-volume, first-edition set by Winston Churchill, according to the documents.

The gifts were not disclosed by the Clintons because the couple turned them over to Bill Clinton's presidential library, the investigators said. Under federal law, gifts that the first family do not keep for themselves are exempt from the public disclosure requirement on presidential gifts, the investigators said.

The findings are contained in a 319-page report that provides a detailed account of gifts that the Clintons received in the White House. The report was compiled after a months-long inquiry by Republican investigators on a House Government Reform subcommittee.

Responding to the report, James E. Kennedy, a spokesman for Mr. Clinton, said: "This story is so old, it's not just dated, it's carbon-dated."

Philippe Reines, speaking for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, also dismissed the report, saying, "Despite a concerted effort to turn a partisan preoccupation into a gift that keeps on giving, there is nothing new here."

The findings, compiled from information contained on the White House gift database, were released this morning during a meeting of the full committee. The report was commissioned by Representative Doug Ose, a California Republican, who is seeking to build support for legislation he has proposed to tighten the rules on gifts to presidents.

He suggested that the people who gave these gifts to the Clintons could have been trying to gain access to the White House and influence the administration's policy decisions.

"I believe that the American people have the right to know what gifts were received and retained by their president," Mr. Ose said.

In February the committee issued a preliminary report in which investigators detailed nearly $400,000 in gifts that the Clintons took with them upon leaving the White House. But the report said that the Clintons underestimated the value of dozens of those gifts.

The February report also said the Clintons did not report dozens of the gifts because their value was set below the threshold for reporting gifts on disclosure statements. The threshold was $250 from 1993 to 1998, and $260 from 1999 on.

The report released today contains a new round of potentially embarrassing information. It documents an array of gifts that the Clintons received and the names of the people who gave those gifts.

There was a $2,000 bronze statue of an angel from Denise Rich; a $9,000 hand-woven Navajo chief's blanket (circa 1885) from Larry Rockefeller; and an oil painted in a gilt frame, a cheese plate, a porcelain teapot, a gold cross and other items totaling $6,000 from Nelson Mandela.

Then there were other gifts that investigators say the Clintons may have used before donating them to the presidential library: nine custom-made tuxedo and dress shirts worth $900 from Walter and Selma Kaye; and four purses worth $8,680 from the handbag designer Judith Leiber.

The report also shows that the former first family received gifts from individuals who were at the center of the Clinton White House campaign finance scandals. To investigators and others, that suggests that the gifts became another avenue for influencing the administration.

There was a $2,100 sculpture of a goddess on a wooden base given by James Riady, an Indonesian businessman who pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations last year and agreed to pay $8.6 million in fines for using foreign corporate money to back Mr. Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign. The Clintons also received two sculptures worth $1,550 from Johnny Chung, who was at the center of a 1996 campaign fund-raising investigation.

The report prompted sharp criticism from government-reform advocates, who said the Clintons acted inappropriately if not illegally, by not reporting the gifts.

"It's a serious allegation if it's true," said Gary Ruskin, the director of the Congressional Accountability Project, a watchdog group. "The least you can say is that they are trying to evade gift reporting."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Young Werther
Some witty soul here at FR said that the people of the Philipenes are now and will forever be greatful to the Clintons for removing the title of worlds worst ruling couple from their nation.
21 posted on 10/09/2002 8:07:20 PM PDT by Hitlerys uterus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Ha! Only the impeached butt-munch would call a closet full of Playboys a "Library."
22 posted on 10/09/2002 8:12:28 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
. . . and four purses worth $8,680 from the handbag designer Judith Leiber.

PURSES????? $2170 per PURSE??? I've never paid that much on a morgage payment! My first car was vastly cheaper than one purse . . . . PURSES???????

23 posted on 10/09/2002 8:18:51 PM PDT by WIladyconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
"Boy, I'll bet they've got a stash of stuff they're not supposed to have in DC and Chappaqua. Where's the IRS when ya need'em?"

Sorry,Presidential Palaces are off limits to the inspectors.

24 posted on 10/09/2002 8:26:31 PM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I wonder if Clinton took a tax deduction for turning all these goodies over to the Clinton Library?
25 posted on 10/09/2002 8:27:52 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic
bump
26 posted on 10/09/2002 8:29:34 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Bump!
27 posted on 10/09/2002 8:38:33 PM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

I say when that library opens - someone better take that list inventory and if the stuff is not there...the IRS and Justice better get on the case!!

We should NEVER forget what they did to our country!!!

28 posted on 10/09/2002 8:39:06 PM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Philippe Reines, speaking for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, also dismissed the report, saying, "Despite a concerted effort to turn a partisan preoccupation into a gift that keeps on giving, there is nothing new here."

But Newt Gingrich using the Democratic copy machine is an issue?

29 posted on 10/09/2002 8:42:06 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Welsh Rabbit
Why would anyone give a card this valuable to Clinton?

He read "Catcher in the Rye" once.

30 posted on 10/09/2002 8:43:27 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
Checking our collective memories here ...

Wasn't it Counsel to Vice President Cheney who tracked down a priceless Lincoln sculpture, said to have been part of the Gore furnishings? Understood it was "mispacked" and returned. In viewing the photos on rintense's Daily Dose, you can see that the sculpture resides over the left shoulder of the President in the Oval Office.

So how does this statue make its way out of the Oval Office, into Gore's office, and then into his packing boxes?

Paging the Ladies Guild ... what was the story of Hitlery re-gifting one of those expensive purses? And where is that beautiful blue bowl in the Clinton office photos?

Don't get me started !!

31 posted on 10/09/2002 8:56:26 PM PDT by Pegita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: John W
"...Sorry,Presidential Palaces are off limits to the inspectors...

Best line of the day!

32 posted on 10/09/2002 9:27:27 PM PDT by Husker8877
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
And a bump back to you...
33 posted on 10/09/2002 9:48:17 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
We know they are crooks & took bribes but what bothers me is things they may have taken from the WH, precious antiques & historical pieces that can't be replaced. Does anyone have a list of things that were missing after the first grifters left?
34 posted on 10/09/2002 10:01:48 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
"Does anyone have a list of things that were missing after the first grifters left?

There is probably so much missing - they are still making the list.

The grifters sold their souls to the devil. I'm wondering when the devil is going to call in his mark and make them fulfill their end of the contract!

35 posted on 10/09/2002 10:08:24 PM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LADY J
The 'grifters' know no rule they are not above. Their lack of character and inability to show real compassion (imagine not getting out of the vehicle you are riding in to see if a man struck by it was hurt like hillary did during her campaigning or ruining a good man-like billy dale-so a friend could snap up his job) is astounding.

They are pigs.

Even that is not enough of an insult. Someone once told me that calling um pigs is a horrid insult to all pigs--and it is. It's just difficult to find a name low enough to describe them.

Don't you wonder how anyone could work for them, support them, vote for them, basically stand being around them? I feel dirty just thinking about what it would be like to be in the same room with them.

36 posted on 10/09/2002 10:20:23 PM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
You people are too obsessed with trashing Clinton... don't you have better things to worry about? He's gone, and despite the popular vote, you somehow managed to snuff Al with the votes of 5 judges, so why you people ranting.... I can keep ranting about that through the whole damn century but I have better things to do than to waste my energy on ancient history... evidently you people don't.
37 posted on 10/09/2002 10:36:10 PM PDT by SocialistEmpyre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SocialistEmpyre
"You people are too obsessed with trashing Clinton... "

No, just sickened when further revelations of the criminality he brought to our Whitehouse show up in the news every other day. It's allmost two years and the scandals keep coming.

"don't you have better things to worry about?"

Yeah, like where Bin Laden will strike next. Shame Clintoon didn't take him when the Sudanese offered him up on a platter.

"He's gone,..."

Would that he were gone. He remains a constant and glaring embarrassment to this country.

"and despite the popular vote,.."

Which despite numerous counts and recounts, not to mention a pile of PROVEN democratic vote fraud, algore never lead or won.

"I can keep ranting about that through the whole damn century..."

Please do! Whining, crybaby, Sore/Loserman liberals who are unable to accept reality {let alone fathom the importance of character} are a constant source of amusement for us.

"I have better things to do than to waste my energy on ancient history... "

The criminal history of the first felon you worship is still being written. Every day some new story detailing the depths of his sexual or criminal depravity seems to break in the headlines. If it weren't for treason supporting, rape ignoring, constitution violating socialists like yourself, he would have long ago been serving time in an orange jumpsuit like he deserves.

38 posted on 10/10/2002 5:44:57 AM PDT by Hitlerys uterus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SocialistEmpyre
Would you feel the same way if a couple of cons walked into your house (we own the White House), trashed your place (we own the White House), walked off with your stuff (we own the White House and furnishings), and then spit in your eye on the way out?
39 posted on 10/10/2002 8:19:58 AM PDT by Pegita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The report prompted sharp criticism from government-reform advocates, who said the Clintons acted inappropriately if not illegally, by not reporting the gifts.

BUMP

40 posted on 10/10/2002 9:45:43 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson