Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheLooseThread
I don't mean to be insulting, but I've seen hundreds of single sided doomsayers here. On whatever subject, they've read a book or two by a panic pimp, dug into some web sites of other's who'd done so and have just enough information to think they know what they're talking about… So all the people in authority have their head in the sand, and it's they that know the reality of it all."

Sometimes it's impossible to prove them wrong due to the nature of the threat or conspiracy, at least without buying the book. Other times I think it's the same people going from one panic to another, never learning that they're just prone to be preyed on by the people pushing this stuff.

I don't know you. Perhaps you’re a reasonable person most of the time. Or perhaps you just finished eating your Y2K supplies and are ready to give it another go. Perhaps you're now one of the pimps and have an interest in that book and are here to promote sells. Who knows… All I know is how to recognize the fear mongering, the lack of balance in the extraordinary claims and the quick reference to something like a book with devilish flaming colors on the cover. Take care.

47 posted on 10/10/2002 6:10:20 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: elfman2
"Perhaps you’re a reasonable person most of the time."

We both agree that reason the key here. This is the definition of reason from the dictionary:

Reason: Good judgment; sound sense.

If you were standing outside during bad weather, and numerous leaders in the field of weather said that their was a significant risk of a tornado heading straight for your position, what would be the reasonable respone? Would it be to sit there and proclaim that you are not going to give in to "fear mongering" and that you abhor "chicken little" types?

The resonable response would be to run like hell.

The book by Preston is a non-fiction book that is his telling of stories that people in the field have had. All of the people in the book are real. Preston, himself, is really understated on all of it. You can get a feel for him via this link: Preston thread on FR

The quote I took from the book before are two people Peter Jahrling (of USAMRIID) and Ricard Moyer (a poxvirus expert). Jahrling's team identified (properly) the antrhax attack as being weapon's grade within hours of the letter being opened. It took the FBI 9 days to figure out he was right.

Some of the people who are gravely concerned about a smallpox attack:

Peter Jahrling, USAMRIID

D.A. Henderson, Headed up WHO's smallpox eradication. Director of Office of Public Health Emergency Preparedness & Response

Ken Alibek, former head of Soviet bio-weapons program, Bio-prepart.

In addition to governement people in the know warning us, the facts sanity check. I sanity checked his assertion by pulling up the abstract for the modifed pox virus that defeats vaccination.

If you want to show that you are unshakable in the face of threat, that's ok. But I don't, personally, believe that it is resonable to ignore knowledable people, who are current directing government policy, when they say there is a significant threat.

48 posted on 10/11/2002 10:17:26 AM PDT by TheLooseThread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson