Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tumbleweed_Connection; stainlessbanner
What other option did Bush have?

Hmmmmm, that's a tough one. Maybe not get involved at all as this is not covered under powers of the government by the Constitution? And please no 'interpretations' of said document and no Acts that have been passed in the past 140 years. Either it's in there or it's not. Forget the right and wrong of unions. I don't agree with them but they're there. The question is 'Does the national government have the right to force people to work when national security and/or defense is not involved'?

21 posted on 10/08/2002 10:50:13 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: billbears
....Does the national government have the right to force people to work.....

The answer is yes...... when the government has provided the workers with monopy powers. Remove the monoply and the power is gone.
76 posted on 10/08/2002 11:23:41 AM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: billbears
I don't know is this makes a difference, but it is my understanding that this is the first time that Taft-Hartley has been invoked during a lockout.
97 posted on 10/08/2002 11:34:39 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson