Posted on 10/08/2002 10:26:17 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
Bush decided to order the Justice Department to seek the injunction after board of inquiry hand-picked by the White House reported that the two-week-old labor standoff has no chance of ending soon, said two administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The board's brief report does not go into detail about the economic and national security impact of the shutdown, but it does hold out little hope for a resolution of the conflict, said one of the sources.
There's even clauses in the contract between UPS Management, and the union that limits how much a UPS driver can lift/carry etc...
I don't see how unions make any private company productive... other than pulling its weight around, and having Luigi smack company execs around a bit..
--erik
Ultimately it doesn't make a difference. This economic effect of this strike/lockout is a proverbial drop of water compared to the tsunami of unraveling credit and debt which has been ongoing.
The worst is yet to come, but this strike/lockout is miniscule compared to the large scale bubbles which are now imploding.
Higher union wages is what has sent all the steel mills and textile mills overseas.
Next we will see these carriers off-loading in Mexico and putting the freight on rails or semi's headed north on the NAFTA Highway. Then we'll see crocodile tears from the unions crybabies.
And what high-tech technology are they whining about??? ...barcodes!! can you believe that?
The California budget is a fantasy. Tax revenues routinely fall 5% under estimates. And now this strike/lockout is shutting down businesses all over the state.
California is already getting a short-term loan "in anticipation of tax revenues" for $12.5 billion later this month just to make ends meet. After this port shutdown, that ain't gonna' be enough. I figure that California "loses" $200 million in tax revenue each day this shutdown continues.
This should be fun to watch!
No, remaining private sector unions have minimal advantage over their non-union counterparts. There are exceptions, however, such as the UAW, which enjoys a symbiotic relationship with management of the global automotive cartel. "Savings" generated by moving automotive component manufacturing offshore are never passed along to the consumer. The substandard conditions and wages exploited offshore merely support ludicrous bonuses for the entire cartel workforce, from the lowliest UAW janitor to the Ford and GM CEOs.
Are the longshoremen responsible for shutting down the West Coast ports?
- The shippers association is trying to break the union. The shippers association is responsible. 51%
- The longshoremen started this dispute with a work slow down. They are at fault. 20%
- U.S. economy is already under attack by our enemies. It does not matter who is at fault. Open the ports. 29%
Should say, is this a set up to make Bush look bad at election time and bring on a recession so the Dems can blame Bush for that. Terrible this thing.
(Article I, Section 8)The Congress shall have power...(t)o regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes....
(perhaps the most-abused and -misunderstood clause of the Constitution)(t)o make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.
The line of reasoning is that since virtually all of the commerce that takes place at a dock is with a foreign nation, Congress would have a role in this. The scope of this role would then fall into debate (IMHO, the further the claws of government remain from this, the better).
You're right; this calls for the entire tin foil suit (now where did I put my records of various tin foil graphics?)
To: Mo1; William McKinley; yall; Grampa Dave Would one of you gifted people help me out? I'd like to make a donation challenge for everyone who wants the Tag Line feature re-instated, without e-mail linking, and I will match the total new monies donated to FreeRepublic, up to $500 total to get this done. Can someone make up what tables or whatever you do, so I can do some thread bombing with this challenge? Thanks a bunch. JL 743 posted on 10/8/02 2:26 PM Eastern by lodwick |
Lodwick wants people who want the "tagline" back to make a donation! He'll match the first $500 worth of donations made by people who clamor for this functionality to be returned. Make the donation, then come to the Fundraiser thread and reply to lodwick and John Robinson saying "I just donated $xxx and I want the taglines back!"
I KNEW that NAFTA was good for something :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.