The Bush administration itself is not sure what strategy is best, so why do you get off calling this organization's recommendation politically motivated. I think you have been drinking too much flouridated water or something. You certainly are paranoid.
Maybe the pediatricians strategy isnt right, however, I think they are right to be concerned about vacinnating every child against a pathogen that may never be released against them or any other child in this country. From what I understand, the current vacine has not been tested on children but that past evidence with older vacines has shown that children suffer more adverse effects than adults.
The alternate strategy to ring vacination is vacinating everyone either voluntarily or involuntarily. From what Ive read recently this could not be done currently even if every doctor and nurse were relieved of their current duties. The article I read recently suggested that it would take until 2004 for all citizens to be vacinated.
What is your concern about restricting travel? I sure as hell would shoot anyone who attempted to leave a contaminated area and thereby spread the disease further. You must be a libertarian who thinks he can do whatever he god damn wants to protect his ass even if it contaminates another 100,000 individuals. Fine example.
You didn't read the article carefully. It stated there should be no voluntary vaccination.
You don't really make sense. You express concern over the dangers of the vaccine, which are about 0ne in a million, but then advocate shooting people who would move from an area where there is an infection.