[Frumious Bandersnatch]

No, you misunderstand my thesis.  I'm stating that every evolutionary experiment is designed.  Evolutionists cannot disprove that ID is the basis for the cosmos, simply because no matter what the experimental result, it was ultimately influenced by intelligent design.

The point I'm making is that there is an inherent bias in experimentation towards ID which is impossible to remove.  One could, of course, write reams on the validitiy and accuracy of the assumptions of evolutionary experiments, but it still doesn't change the point that all of it is still (more or less) intelligently designed.

[balrog666]

No, you misunderstand my thesis.

Perhaps, but the conclusion you would reach from my little experiment is wrong, so your premise must still be in error.

Evolutionists cannot disprove that ID is the basis for the cosmos

Of course not! ID/IOT makes no predictions that can be verified *OR* falsified.

The fact is that your statement is exactly the same as "Evolutionists cannot disprove that [a giant chicken from Pasedena named Harry] is the basis for the cosmos".

Can you see that?