[balrog666]

No, you misunderstand my thesis.

Perhaps, but the conclusion you would reach from my little experiment is wrong, so your premise must still be in error.

Evolutionists cannot disprove that ID is the basis for the cosmos

Of course not! ID/IOT makes no predictions that can be verified *OR* falsified.

The fact is that your statement is exactly the same as "Evolutionists cannot disprove that [a giant chicken from Pasedena named Harry] is the basis for the cosmos".

Can you see that?

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

Ah, I was wondering when someone was going to throw in the 'falsifiability' strawman once again.  I've noticed that quite often when evolutionary religionists cannot verify their claims they throw the burden of proof on IDers.  Fine, therefore I'll make a verifiable claim - and a challenge.  It goes thusly: All experimentation has, at its source, a recognizable and absolutely essential design element.  Show me even *one* evolutionary experiment which has no design basis.