To: Howlin
Didn't this appeal go to David Souter? I think he is the "justice" with jurisdiction over the Northeast districts.
Way to go, SCOTUS. Thanks for nullifying the primary process and spitting on the right to vote for military personnel, etal.
New Jersey FREEPers, you now know what it will take for a Republican in your ranks: an all out effort to defeat millionaire Frank Lousyberg and the Dash-hole idiots. And while you're at it, try impeaching any or all of those jackals on your Supreme Court, too.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Whew. I just cannot believe it, even though I knew it was coming. The law just isn't the law anymore.
26 posted on
10/07/2002 10:58:26 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: Recovering_Democrat
I believe this was the NJ Superior court ruling, not the SCOTUS.
46 posted on
10/07/2002 11:01:23 AM PDT by
Lightnin
To: Recovering_Democrat
If we should defeat the Lautenberg in NJ, the Dems will be back in court Wednesday morning, screaming how it wasn't fair that they didn't have enough time, and that the NJSC should have not only allowed Lautenberg, but extended the election period to allow for a fair campaign.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Having Souter represent the circuit is a formality. There weren't enough justices who wanted to take the case.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Does this mean that only Souter decides if this case is to be heard?
267 posted on
10/07/2002 11:54:10 AM PDT by
hsmomx3
To: Recovering_Democrat
Not SCOTUS, but SCNJ. The SCOTUS refused to hear the case.
To: Recovering_Democrat
I "wonder" if they would permit the ballots to be changed if the Green Party candidate (or Reform Party candidate, etc.) were to pull out of the race or does this only hold for the "big 2"?
373 posted on
10/07/2002 12:57:43 PM PDT by
weegee
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson