Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DJ US Supreme Court Rejects GOP New Jersey Ballot Appeal.
DJ

Posted on 10/07/2002 10:51:49 AM PDT by segis

Just saw this on the DJ Wire.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: segis
Unfreakinbelievable. Nice precedent to set too, huh. Why don't the republicans see who might be losing right now and replace them? The law doesn't matter, so who cares!
41 posted on 10/07/2002 11:08:26 AM PDT by Jennifer in Florida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
what do you mean?
42 posted on 10/07/2002 11:09:48 AM PDT by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: segis
God save us from the democraps.
43 posted on 10/07/2002 11:10:53 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
As I said the other day...when the jury box and the ballot box become corrupted, the only recourse may be to the ammo box. I think this is a huge loss for our country. The rule of law means nothing to RATs, and none of this will really register with the majority of Americans.
44 posted on 10/07/2002 11:11:05 AM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: segis
Don't ya just know Slick Willie is lighting a cigar and pounding on his drum right now.
45 posted on 10/07/2002 11:12:36 AM PDT by ConservativeLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jennifer in Florida
Why don't the republicans see who might be losing right now and replace them?

Jennifer, Jennifer, dear, sweet, innocent Jennifer....this only works for the RATs.

46 posted on 10/07/2002 11:14:11 AM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: segis
The USSC is not willing to protect the most sacred aspect of our Republic...the integrity of the ballot box. Unbelievable.
47 posted on 10/07/2002 11:17:10 AM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
I think the poster was being facetious. Don't you think the ICC can solve this for us?? heh
48 posted on 10/07/2002 11:17:20 AM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
Re#42

As I understand it, Forrester the candidate sought the relief. There was some argument that he did not have "standing" i.e. did not suffer individual injury (aside from $$$ spent which is not cause for an injunction). As to the other parties, I guess the Supremes did not see this as warranting emergency relief. They did not say why they refused, which is the least they could have done.

I do hope they realize that the Rats will play these games to no end until stopped. The Rule of Law means nothing unless enforced. *sigh*

49 posted on 10/07/2002 11:17:33 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Those two judges who donated to Torricelli's campaign should be disbarred and impeached

Judicial Ethics (no snickering please) mandated that they should have recused themselves. This whole thing stinks.

50 posted on 10/07/2002 11:19:03 AM PDT by MattinNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Thanks, Souter. You're a real gem.

And additional thanks to Poppy Bush for appointing this gem.

51 posted on 10/07/2002 11:20:09 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MattinNJ
While I would rather have the justices restore honor the Samurai way, can we at least get them out? Not that they won't be replaced with liberals, but disbarment and impeachment need to be done.

BTW, isn't donating money to a political campaign in and of itself a violation of judicial ethics, regardless of recusal for this case?

52 posted on 10/07/2002 11:22:36 AM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: WBeckham
DJ Wire is the Dow Jones NewsWire. I get that info from a market data terminal that updates realtime.

Be well.

53 posted on 10/07/2002 11:22:45 AM PDT by segis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
"Since the SCOTUS has passed on it, this New Jersey ballot change can be done anywhere in the country citing the New Jersey Supreme Court decision and the failure of the SCOTUS to step in"

Nope, not at all. NJ Supreme Court decisions only apply to New Jersey.

Didn't Forrester get on the primary ballot the same way?
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/05/nyregion/05JERS.html
54 posted on 10/07/2002 11:35:11 AM PDT by mykej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it
fails to observe the law scrupulously. [Our government is the potent, the
omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its
example.] Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it
breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself;
it invites anarchy. -Justice Brandeis
55 posted on 10/07/2002 11:39:01 AM PDT by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mykej
"Didn't Forrester get on the primary ballot the same way?"

Nope. I can't read your link, but, IIRC, Forrester actually *won* the primary.

56 posted on 10/07/2002 11:40:13 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: segis
Nuts
57 posted on 10/07/2002 11:40:30 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl
Thanks, Souter. You're a real gem. And additional thanks to Poppy Bush for appointing this gem.

And thank liberal Republican Christine Todd Whitman for appointing these liberals in New Jersey.

58 posted on 10/07/2002 11:43:26 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
" Nope. I can't read your link, but, IIRC, Forrester actually *won* the primary."

Yes, but he wouldn't have been in the primary unless Treffinger had dropped out. Forrester took Treffinger's place on the primary ballot, 40 days before the election. Which is less than 51 days, which puts it clearly in the territory of title 19.

At least that's the argument other people in the primary made back in April.
59 posted on 10/07/2002 11:53:16 AM PDT by mykej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeLawyer
Don't ya just know Slick Willie is lighting a cigar and pounding on his drum right now.

He might be pounding, but I bet it ain't a drum.

60 posted on 10/07/2002 11:54:36 AM PDT by TwoBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson