Skip to comments.
DJ US Supreme Court Rejects GOP New Jersey Ballot Appeal.
DJ
Posted on 10/07/2002 10:51:49 AM PDT by segis
Just saw this on the DJ Wire.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: segis
Unfreakinbelievable. Nice precedent to set too, huh. Why don't the republicans see who might be losing right now and replace them? The law doesn't matter, so who cares!
To: eureka!
what do you mean?
To: segis
God save us from the democraps.
To: Timesink
As I said the other day...when the jury box and the ballot box become corrupted, the only recourse may be to the ammo box. I think this is a huge loss for our country. The rule of law means nothing to RATs, and none of this will really register with the majority of Americans.
To: segis
Don't ya just know Slick Willie is lighting a cigar and pounding on his drum right now.
To: Jennifer in Florida
Why don't the republicans see who might be losing right now and replace them?Jennifer, Jennifer, dear, sweet, innocent Jennifer....this only works for the RATs.
To: segis
The USSC is not willing to protect the most sacred aspect of our Republic...the integrity of the ballot box. Unbelievable.
47
posted on
10/07/2002 11:17:10 AM PDT
by
#3Fan
To: Spiff
I think the poster was being facetious. Don't you think the ICC can solve this for us?? heh
48
posted on
10/07/2002 11:17:20 AM PDT
by
lainie
To: The Wizard
Re#42
As I understand it, Forrester the candidate sought the relief. There was some argument that he did not have "standing" i.e. did not suffer individual injury (aside from $$$ spent which is not cause for an injunction). As to the other parties, I guess the Supremes did not see this as warranting emergency relief. They did not say why they refused, which is the least they could have done.
I do hope they realize that the Rats will play these games to no end until stopped. The Rule of Law means nothing unless enforced. *sigh*
49
posted on
10/07/2002 11:17:33 AM PDT
by
eureka!
To: AmishDude
Those two judges who donated to Torricelli's campaign should be disbarred and impeachedJudicial Ethics (no snickering please) mandated that they should have recused themselves. This whole thing stinks.
50
posted on
10/07/2002 11:19:03 AM PDT
by
MattinNJ
To: Recovering_Democrat
Thanks, Souter. You're a real gem. And additional thanks to Poppy Bush for appointing this gem.
51
posted on
10/07/2002 11:20:09 AM PDT
by
jpl
To: MattinNJ
While I would rather have the justices restore honor the Samurai way, can we at least get them out? Not that they won't be replaced with liberals, but disbarment and impeachment need to be done.
BTW, isn't donating money to a political campaign in and of itself a violation of judicial ethics, regardless of recusal for this case?
To: WBeckham
DJ Wire is the Dow Jones NewsWire. I get that info from a market data terminal that updates realtime.
Be well.
53
posted on
10/07/2002 11:22:45 AM PDT
by
segis
To: mass55th
"Since the SCOTUS has passed on it, this New Jersey ballot change can be done anywhere in the country citing the New Jersey Supreme Court decision and the failure of the SCOTUS to step in"
Nope, not at all. NJ Supreme Court decisions only apply to New Jersey.
Didn't Forrester get on the primary ballot the same way?
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/05/nyregion/05JERS.html
54
posted on
10/07/2002 11:35:11 AM PDT
by
mykej
To: Timesink
In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it
fails to observe the law scrupulously. [Our government is the potent, the
omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its
example.] Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it
breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself;
it invites anarchy. -Justice Brandeis
To: mykej
"Didn't Forrester get on the primary ballot the same way?" Nope. I can't read your link, but, IIRC, Forrester actually *won* the primary.
To: segis
Nuts
57
posted on
10/07/2002 11:40:30 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: jpl
Thanks, Souter. You're a real gem. And additional thanks to Poppy Bush for appointing this gem. And thank liberal Republican Christine Todd Whitman for appointing these liberals in New Jersey.
58
posted on
10/07/2002 11:43:26 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Cyber Liberty
" Nope. I can't read your link, but, IIRC, Forrester actually *won* the primary."
Yes, but he wouldn't have been in the primary unless Treffinger had dropped out. Forrester took Treffinger's place on the primary ballot, 40 days before the election. Which is less than 51 days, which puts it clearly in the territory of title 19.
At least that's the argument other people in the primary made back in April.
59
posted on
10/07/2002 11:53:16 AM PDT
by
mykej
To: ConservativeLawyer
Don't ya just know Slick Willie is lighting a cigar and pounding on his drum right now. He might be pounding, but I bet it ain't a drum.
60
posted on
10/07/2002 11:54:36 AM PDT
by
TwoBear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson