Public Says Bush Needs to Pay Heed to Weak Economy (NYT/CBS/SaveTheRats poll)

The New York Times ^ | 10/07/2002 | ADAM NAGOURNEY and JANET ELDER

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Blaming President Bush for the economy is a ridiculous, unfair, and inaccurate attack for the Democrats in Congress to make.

Bush does not have that big of an affect on the economy--Alan Greespan probably can influence the stock market more directly than Bush can.

[Howlin]

This article is a FRAUD; the Times left out the part that says the WAR is more important that the economy.......BY FOUR PERCENT!!!!

They also left OUT the part that says Bush is "doing the right thing" and "spending the correct amount of time on this!

Watch Brit Hume...........they flat out LEFT OUT THE PARTS THAT WERE FAVORABLE TO BUSH!!!!

[Howlin]

Please see #42~!!!!!!

[Howlin]

Please read 42. I am just FURIOUS!

[mystery-ak]

I saw it too....did you get the numbers...I was cleaning up the dinner dishes and couldn't write it down.

[deport]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/764235/posts?page=27#27

Yes some of that is covered in the above links.... They picked the parts they wanted to emphasize and omitted the other parts....

[deport]

Check the links below in post #27 from last night....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/764235/posts?page=27#27

[Howlin]

I just found your posts.........this is OUT-DAMN-RAGEOUS!

[Howlin]

See #46.....deport got them off ANOTHER WEB SITE!!!!

[mystery-ak]

thanks.....HOW CONVENIENT!

[MJY1288]

This is typical of the NYT's! Nothing coming from the NYT's is believable, I know that!, You know that!, Now we need to let the whole world know that!

[wingnuts'nbolts]

Brit Hume just gave the real findings of this pole and they are NOT what the Times printed. The Times, as usual has skewed the figures to read the way they want. The actual poll results say something quite different. Who woulda guessed?

[Henchster]

This thread should be re-titled:

NY TIMES PROVES LIBERAL BIAS BY SKEWING POLL RESULTS!

[PhiKapMom]

You are so right -- this is a bogus news article but what is new from the NY Times!

Rush took them to task today on his show because of the way they asked the questions. Heard that part of it while going to lunch today.

Why anyone would believe anything the NY Times says is beyond me. Raines is nothing more than a puppet of the Democrat National Committee run by Mcauliffe and the power behind him is the clintons. When ms. clinton says jump, Raines says "How high?"

NY Times doesn't even deserve to be considered credible on anything they do anymore. They have shown their true colors over and over again -- purely on the side of the Clinton DemocRAT Party!