Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If They Believe That - Science
Fire and Hammer ^ | October, 2002 | unknown

Posted on 10/06/2002 12:36:19 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Second in series.

Long.

1 posted on 10/06/2002 12:36:19 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Experimental Psychology is indeed a science. Psychology is a very broad area, so wide it is fractured into many parts. Physiological and Comparative psychology are subsumed under Experimental psychology, and use the scientific method exclusively.

Medical psychology and its reliance upon matters medical would seem to be a science. However, much of medicine is more art and skill than science.

2 posted on 10/06/2002 12:57:03 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; Landru
Good article but way too long for most of us to absorb. However, it brings me to one of my favorite rants. Huge numbers of our population have bought into the "food supplement" philosophy of healthcare because it is "natural."

Well, arsenic is "natural," but it wouldn't be a good idea to ingest it. The healthfood, supplement crowd claims that herbs are better than chemical drugs. They are apparently unaware of the fact that most of our "drugs" come from herbs, fungi, etc.--all "natural." While they are also unaware of the fact that these over the counter supplements all have potentially serious side affects just like any other "drug."
3 posted on 10/06/2002 12:57:09 PM PDT by scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
A recent experiment (scientific, I might add) had an array of different folks looking at pictures of faces that had been intentionally "scrambled." The ones who immediately (and correctly) saw a human face in the mess had higher levels of a certain neurotransmitter. The ones who had higher levels of dopamine were the ones most likely to see repeating patterns in things around them.

Dopamine deprivation is essential to "scientific" studies, but of no avail to those who are religious or "superstitious."

Sadly, it's the "scientists" who are missing most of what's going on in the universe.

4 posted on 10/06/2002 12:59:51 PM PDT by mfulstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
good piece, thanks.
5 posted on 10/06/2002 1:00:46 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scholar
There was once a treatment method for syphilis that employed arsenic (I think it was 'salvarsen'). There were cures of the disease, if one lived through it, proven by the absence of spirochetes in the blood where once they could be found. Most chemo-cancer treatments rely on poisoning something to effect a cure.

Hank, this was one long article and my head now hurts, but it was interesting in the main.

6 posted on 10/06/2002 1:08:42 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
No system of thought is ever held because it is proven.

A culture believes what it wants to believe.

And if what the culture wants to believe enhances suvival, then the culture survives.

If not, then the culture and the belief in its preferred ideas perish.

7 posted on 10/06/2002 1:08:45 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Remember, the purpose of your life is your enjoyment of it, not making it last as long as possible.

This should be on posters in every school and public place in America.

8 posted on 10/06/2002 1:14:56 PM PDT by Jonathon Spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Much of psychology fails the test for scientific objectivity here also. Though mostly discredited today, psychoanalysis could never have been science, because it could not be falsified (and it is false). With or without psychoanalysis, most of psychology remains unscientific, because it is based on the unscientific, that is, unfalsifiable concept of the subconscious (which is also false).

------------------------------

What this tells me is that the author has not done much serious psychotherapy.

9 posted on 10/06/2002 1:24:06 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
There was once a treatment method for syphilis that employed arsenic

-----------------------

Before penicillin, that's all there was. The alternative was to see your flesh rot of your bones. Many of the people that were diagnosed with leprosy actually had VD.

10 posted on 10/06/2002 1:29:02 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scholar
While they are also unaware of the fact that these over the counter supplements all have potentially serious side affects ...

So does a Big Mac. Medical doctors and their consumers are as prone, or even more prone, to misuse their drugs as people who have chosen 'natural' medicine. The consequence of medical drug misuse is more dangerous to the patient and the general population as well.

11 posted on 10/06/2002 1:49:39 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

I'M BACK!!!

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

WIPE THE SMILE OFF OF THIS MAN'S FACE.
VOTE THE RATS
OUT!! DONATE TODAY
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate here by secure server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794



12 posted on 10/06/2002 1:51:26 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RLK
What this tells me is that the author has not done much serious psychotherapy.

There is a school of thought based on the premise that 'what works is real'. It's not scientific, I suppose, but it's difficult to argue with.

13 posted on 10/06/2002 1:56:00 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: templar
What this tells me is that the author has not done much serious psychotherapy. There is a school of thought based on the premise that 'what works is real'. It's not scientific, I suppose, but it's difficult to argue with.

------------------------------------

A hypothetical construct is based upon recurrent antecedant on consequent conditions. The subconscious and/or preconscious is such a construct. Psychotherapeutic experience shows a preproduceable recurrent pattern exists.

14 posted on 10/06/2002 2:13:41 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RLK
There was once a treatment method for syphilis that employed arsenic

Yep, will work every time if you take enough of it. No more syphilis. (as well as no pulse)

15 posted on 10/06/2002 2:27:31 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin
Yep, will work every time if you take enough of it. No more syphilis. (as well as no pulse)

--------------------------

Actually, Arsenic is not so lethal if administered in slowly increasing doses. The body developes some tolerance for it. For many years it was used as an internally applied beauty aid. Serious amounts of it would give women a light complexion that they likes.

16 posted on 10/06/2002 2:33:34 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
later
17 posted on 10/06/2002 2:58:51 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
You might look into the various schools of engineering. The body of though comprising engineering is believed because it is proven.

Boilers used to blow up until the insurance company (Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Co.)that had to pay for them decided to pay engineers to figure out pressure tolerances instead and mandate them to their insureds.

You cannot assert that all beliefs are held without proof. Aeronautics is another good example.

18 posted on 10/06/2002 3:13:02 PM PDT by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
You cannot assert that all beliefs are held without proof. Aeronautics is another good example.

A belief is just what one holds to be true. There is nothing wrong with beliefs. You wouldn't go to the grocery store if you didn't think there would be milk on the shelf when you got there. You can't see the milk, you only believe it will be there. In this case the belief is a perfectly rational one.

Is not belief that is superstition, it is belief with no rational basis that is superstition.

Hank

19 posted on 10/06/2002 4:18:14 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RLK
A hypothetical construct is based upon recurrent antecedant on consequent conditions. The subconscious and/or preconscious is such a construct. Psychotherapeutic experience shows a preproduceable recurrent pattern exists.

I must respectfully disagree. Psychoendermic hypothetorationalization is antequadriponic in relation to preproduceable recurrent patterns. Therefore, the principles of exoantecedenal preconscio-superexationalization must necessarily take the precedence.

20 posted on 10/06/2002 4:21:28 PM PDT by john in missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson