[Cicero]

I suggest that you go back and read it. Oswald is not the subject of the article, and what he thinks about it is completely irrelevant.

There is a ton of evidence that the Reno FBI suppressed evidence in this case.

Why did they do this? One possible reason is that these Islamic terrorists were so-called "double agents" or unreliable informers, being paid by the FBI.

There is also some evidence that clinton knew about the bombing before it happened. And that the CIA and ATF were involved beforehand, as well as the FBI.

AND absolutely persuasive evidence that the fertilizer bomb did not bring down the building, because it could not possibly have pulverized the reinforced concrete pillars from that distance. There is expert testimony to that effect from Brigadier General Partin. Somebody strapped at least three or four parcels of plastic explosives to the pillars in the basement. The most likely candidates are these same Muslim terrorists, or paid federal double agents.

[weikel]

AND absolutely persuasive evidence that the fertilizer bomb did not bring down the building, because it could not possibly have pulverized the reinforced concrete pillars from that distance. There is expert testimony to that effect from Brigadier General Partin. Somebody strapped at least three or four parcels of plastic explosives to the pillars in the basement. The most likely candidates are these same Muslim terrorists, or paid federal double agents.

Exactly any civil engineer or explosives expert could take one look at the picture and laugh their a** off at the official explanation.

[Lunatic Fringe]

I did read it... I was convinced long ago that there was a conspiracy-- Tim McVeigh was executed rather quickly, and without much of a fight

[Burkeman1]

So what are you saying? Are you saying the first WTC bombing was a Clinton operation- or done by our own government? I have never known you to be a tin foil hat guy. What am I missing?