Skip to comments.
CONSPIRACY: The Okla. City-Sept. 11 Connection
Philadelphia Daily News ^
| Oct. 03, 2002
| Michael Smerconish
Posted on 10/04/2002 6:16:46 PM PDT by FreeperinRATcage
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: weikel
Re Post #9: Thanks,
gitmo, for the links to the OKBIC website. I notice that OKBIC has done a very nice redesign of the site since I last visited it...
weikel wrote "I don't think the buildings blast damage is consistent with the official explanation."
Nor do I -- see pp 191 - 256 0f the OKBIC Final Report.
TXnMA (No Longer!!!)
21
posted on
10/04/2002 7:57:25 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
To: Cicero
So what are you saying? Are you saying the first WTC bombing was a Clinton operation- or done by our own government? I have never known you to be a tin foil hat guy. What am I missing?
To: TXnMA
Don't need to read something that lengthy it takes a lot of Newtons of force suddenly applied to do that kinda of damage. A fertilizer bomb from the exterior parking lot just wouldn't do it.
23
posted on
10/04/2002 8:00:54 PM PDT
by
weikel
To: Burkeman1
You don't have to be tinfoil just think about the physics of the blast. Could a fertilizer bomb from the parking lot( given the size of the bomb and distance from the building) have caused such extensive damage to reinforced concrete?
24
posted on
10/04/2002 8:03:51 PM PDT
by
weikel
To: Lunatic Fringe
Kennedy assasination stuff is no good even for entertainment value the various conspiracy theories cancel each other out. The stuff about shapeshifting reptilian human hybrids controlling the world makes more sense than just about every Kennedy assasination theory there is.
25
posted on
10/04/2002 8:09:56 PM PDT
by
weikel
To: gitmo
Thanks! See my post #21 -- and you've got FReepMail...
TXnMA (No Longer!!!)
26
posted on
10/04/2002 8:12:33 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
To: weikel
I am sorry- I don't doubt what you are saying. But who was behind it then? What is Cicero saying?
To: Burkeman1
Who knows whos behind it although I suspect Reno was deeply involved.
28
posted on
10/04/2002 8:21:32 PM PDT
by
weikel
To: FreeperinRATcage
The Kennedy wackiness aside, Specter wouldn't touch this if he didn't think it had some merit. Specter wouldn't touch it if he didn't think there was something in it for him. He apparently recognizes that times have changed.
Which doesn't necessarily mean that the conspiracy theories about OKC are incorrect. Myself, I believe those conspiracy theories.
And if Specter's shift indicates that a power shift may now lead to the revelation of previously concealed truths, we may soon find out a lot that has been kept hidden from us.
To: FreeperinRATcage
As much as I hate Clinton, I never believed he would sink so low as to cover the possibility of Middle-Eastern terrorists having a part in the OKC bombing. Now, it is beginning to appear that even in this most tragic event of his watch, he lied and used the situation for his own political gain.
WFTR
Bill
30
posted on
10/04/2002 8:34:56 PM PDT
by
WFTR
To: FreeperinRATcage
Oh sure... He'll investigate and then have a Senate trial under Scottish Law! Ha Ha Ha Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaa!
That Democrat lawyer for the house impeachment whose good name escapes me right now has been helping her a lot lately. (David Schippers, that's it!)
To: weikel
Don't need to read something that lengthy it takes a lot of Newtons of force suddenly applied to do that kinda of damage. A fertilizer bomb from the exterior parking lot just wouldn't do it. Actually, the truck was parked in the street (in a curb cut) immediately in front of the building. (That's where the crater was.)
Nonetheless, the center of the crater was 16.4 ft from the closest column -- G20(A5) -- well beyond the demonstrated brisant radius. And the localized damage done to column G16(A7) and the associated section of 3rd floor transfer beam -- over 50 feet away (with no intervening damage to the beam) -- is totally inconsistent with air blast.
Exterior parking lot? A little reading might not hurt...;-}
TXnMA (No Longer)
32
posted on
10/04/2002 8:39:13 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
To: FreeperinRATcage
Good grief. Don't be ridiculous. Specter is not to trusted with anything.
To: savedbygrace
Bump, to have a link in my files
34
posted on
10/04/2002 8:42:08 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
To: Burkeman1
"McVeigh's execution was in record time and that alone makes me suspicious."To say nothing of the MAD RUSH to BURY all the evidence by razing and bulldozing the site!!!
Just like Osama, Saddam smote the USA using our own resources!
Clinton didn't want to deal with foreign terrorist in addition to Gingrich, Rush, the 1994 landslide to conservatives, even Christian fundamentalist ones at that!
He was in such deep doodoo that his Presidency was in danger and this was just too easy to spin just the right way for his political salvation! He gained the whole world, but lost his own soul and hurt the soul of America!!!
To: TXnMA
the truck was parked in the street This isn't connected but the company I worked for on 9/11 had a van parked below the first tower when it was hit. One of our guys was up there and he died that day. Our guy in the van saw jumpers hit the ground and his van was pelted with debris. Weird. Still gets to me.
To: SierraWasp
Damn- I will give you that and I am opposed to the war against Iraq. Clinton is that much of a scumbag to blame it on "domestic right wing lunatics" and cover up foreign connections for his own advantage. I have no problem seeing that at all. Just want Bush to show me. But that would mean hurting the entire beltway and Bush would be dead in the water.
To: Burkeman1
Iraq is not our real enemy but it is between our real enemies( Saudi Arabia and Iran). So Ive come to the conclusion thats why they are going before the Saudis.
38
posted on
10/04/2002 9:19:23 PM PDT
by
weikel
To: Burkeman1
Whiel yoe are entitled to your skepticism, I find the OKC-ALQ link to be credible. I also find the WTC-ALQ link to be credible. And, the USS Cole/ALQ link.
Actually, I would be shocked to learn there is no ANTHRAX-ALQ link.
Because: 1) it happened too fast after 9-11 )two days later). 2) no one took creidt--why do it if you aren't going make headlines 3) it was too crude, 4) AlQ already showed (crop-dusters, etal.) that they were considering use of bio-weapons....
To: Antoninus
Next time try something a tad more relevent in the keywords and I'd have found it :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson