Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
.223 was intentionally designed by the military to wound, not kill. In my opinion, fatal single shots from 150 yards + indicates a certain amount of discipline and expertise.

The ar15.com site mentions a bullet hole in a window that is too big to have come from a .223 round.

The sniper(s) dumped the large white van by now, too hot. Actually, I agree that a large white van probably was not used to begin with, since it is different enough to be relatively easy to spot in a neighborhood should the sniper have had the bad luck to be profiled.

Seems to me, a regular van or SUV would work just fine.

The MO is terrorism of soccer-parent central Eastern seaboard. The most obvious political agenda is the need by the gun grabbers for Congress to pass a bill continuing the '94 Assault Weapon Ban. The primary target of the Assault Weapon Ban was the AR-15 and clones in .223 caliber.

GWB has stated on record that he'll sign a continuance of the '94 AWB if it reaches his desk. As of before these shootings started, it did not look likely that any such bill would have made it past either next year's Senate or House.

So: these shootings are as if they were tailormade to hand losing Democrat members of Congress across the country an issue out of the blue that could rescue their campaigns and throw projected control of Congress back to the Democrats in the next session.

The AR15 has been around since the Vietnam War. Sniper rifles have been around since the Revolutionary War. There have not been many (if any) cases of random sniper terrorism. The question is why now? The underlying question needs to be who benefits?

(And these are the kinds of questions the FBI does not seem to be asking...)

319 posted on 10/04/2002 1:34:53 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: SteveH
Being reported that the latest victim should live.....
328 posted on 10/04/2002 1:39:06 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

To: SteveH
.223 was intentionally designed by the military to wound, not kill...

Is this different form the .223 Remington that's been around since the 60s?

332 posted on 10/04/2002 1:41:04 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

To: SteveH
".223 was intentionally designed by the military to wound, not kill. In my opinion, fatal single shots from 150 yards + indicates a certain amount of discipline and expertise."

The .223 round is surprisingly powerful for a smaller cartridge. When I was in Basic Training at Ft. Benning, GA. the Drill Sgts. filled up an ammo can with water, and sealed it shut. One of the Drill Sgts. put one .223 round through it at 50 meters, then they let us trainees walk by in a single file line, and look at what the .223 did to that ammo can. It put a pretty big hole in the exit side of the can!

357 posted on 10/04/2002 1:49:29 PM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

To: SteveH
Steve,

The .223 was not designed to wound. It was most certainly designed to kill. The myth that the .223 was designed to wound was started after Vietnam by some of the "old school" who thought the .308 was the minimum that we should use.

Mike

433 posted on 10/04/2002 2:38:03 PM PDT by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson