Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveH
Steve,

The .223 was not designed to wound. It was most certainly designed to kill. The myth that the .223 was designed to wound was started after Vietnam by some of the "old school" who thought the .308 was the minimum that we should use.

Mike

433 posted on 10/04/2002 2:38:03 PM PDT by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]


To: BCR #226
The .223 was not designed to wound. It was most certainly designed to kill. The myth that the .223 was designed to wound was started after Vietnam by some of the "old school" who thought the .308 was the minimum that we should use.

Gaack, I posted reflexively without checking my obviously aging recollections and sources. Oh well, now I that I've had a chance to google this I can't seem to dig up an authoritative reference for the wound-over-kill thing as design goal. Therefore I apologize for the noise. Comments on my other input still welcome. (I still have doubts about the profile information coming out... but perhaps that is for some other thread.)

693 posted on 10/04/2002 11:27:54 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson