[Arkinsaw]

If we are too afraid to do what's right because of how it will look

Being afraid and using smart and subtle tactics are two very different things. Fighting against this ruling can be done in other ways besides changing your whole campaign strategy to make it your prime issue.

[Peach]

Fighting against this ruling can be done in other ways besides changing your whole campaign strategy to make it your prime issue.

Now that I agree with completely. I think Forrester can beat his opponent easily without mentioning the NJSC decision, all while letting his lawyers fight it out in court.

[LADY J]

Nice words - but the last time I looked - I never saw a RAT that was afraid to look like a partisan and it's worked very well by making the Republicans bend over backwards trying to be the 'gentleman and lady'!

In this world you need to stand up for what is right and what you believe in.

Playing nice has not worked before and it won't work now!

The more you give in to a RAT - the more they demand! Look what 'in your face' tactics they're pulling right now. They expect us to shut up and be nice about it - so they can do it again.

[Iwo Jima]

"Fighting against this ruling can be done in other ways besides changing your whole campaign strategy to make it your prime issue."

Now you're setting up a straw man. No one has even suggested doing such a thing. You originally stated that Forrester should announce that he would not contest the ruling. That is wrong, wrong, wrong.

You act as thought there is no intelligent way to contest the ruling. Again, straw man. There are good ways and bad ways to do anything. Bush did it the right way in Florida. Have you read the brief the Repub filed with the USSC? I thought not. Again, the right way. You're comment linking a court fight with running into a brick wall shows that you do not have a clue what you are talking about.