Posted on 10/03/2002 6:27:52 AM PDT by SJackson
In a closed-door Democratic strategy meeting in 1999, New Jersey's then-senior Sen. Frank Lautenberg criticized Sen. Bob Torricelli, his junior colleague, for openly "dissing" him in a state newspaper and speaking well of Republican Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, who at the time seemed to be preparing to challenge Lautenberg's Senate seat in 2000.
Lautenberg wasn't happy. But never one to take correction well, Torricelli went ballistic. "You're a [expletive deleted] piece of [expletive deleted]!" he raged, "and I'm going to cut your [genitalia] off!"
Needless to say, Lautenberg wasn't the Torch's choice to replace him. He was Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle's.
A U.S. Supreme Court battle could still be ahead. But if the 78-year old multi-millionaire does get on the ballot legally, the Forrester team could have a field day with Lautenberg's radical liberal record.
With a war against Iraq looming, for example, Lautenberg is vulnerable to the charge that he's a wimp on national security.
In 1991, he voted against authorizing military force against Saddam Hussein during the Gulf War. He predicted "tens of thousands of American casualties," a new U.S. draft and warned the U.S. could end up destroying Kuwait in the process of trying to liberate it.
In 1984 -- at the height of the Cold War -- he voted for Ted Kennedy's "nuclear freeze" proposal.
He voted for the Intelligence Oversight Act of 1988 to restrict the conduct of foreign covert operations, and voted in 1992 to cut the U.S. intelligence budget by $1 billion.
He's consistently voted against building missile defenses to protect the homeland or U.S. troops and allies, and in 1991 supported an amendment that would have cut defense spending by a whopping $80 billion.
Lautenberg is also vulnerable to the charge he's soft on terrorism.
On October 26, 1989, for example, the Senate voted on a bill introduced by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) to impose the death penalty for terrorists who kill U.S. citizens in foreign countries. The bill passed 79-20. But Lautenberg actually voted against it.
Then, on February 20, 1991, Lautenberg voted for an amendment to rescind the death penalty for terrorists who murder Americans in the U.S. or abroad and instead impose life in prison.
That amendment was defeated 25 to 72, but joining Lautenberg against the death penalty for terrorists was none other than Democrat Senators Ted Kennedy, Paul Wellstone, Tom Harkin, John Kerry and Al Gore.
Imagine for a moment that bill had passed with the help of Lautenberg, Wellstone and Gore. Imagine then that we catch Osama bin Laden alive. Imagine then that instead of electrocuting bin Laden to death -- or giving him a lethal injection -- for masterminding the death of thousands of innocent Americans, we instead were required to put him in a Holiday Inn-style prison where he could watch cable television, write a bestselling book, and be interviewed on "60 Minutes."
In 1988, Lautenberg voted against the death penalty for "drug kingpins" who commit murders or order the murder of others.
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
According to that standard, Doug Forrester won when Torricelli withdrew.
Any subsequent questioning of the victory of Doug Forrester, and any further expense incurred by his campaign, is a tort for which his campaign should sue for trible damages under RICO. Let the National Democratic Party chew on that for awhile!
. . . and there's nothing like suing the whole bunch under RICO to tie them together!!
Well, why not accept a debate--then no-show in favor of Rudi Guliani?! Same principle as switching Lautenberg for Torricelli . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.