[Teacher317]

Thanks for the quick reply, especially when you MUST be VERY busy! I think I want to start another thread, listing all of the people who have been harmed by this decision...

• NJ Democrat primary voters have lost the right to have their choice as the printed name on the ballot, as they worked so hard to do
• Forrester has lost millions in campaign donations running against the candidate he had every legal right to expect to oppose
• GOP donors have lost their chance to donate for a run against Lautenberg
• the GOP donors whose funds to run against the Torch have been wasted
• the overseas voters whose already-cast ballots have just been invalidated
• the Democrat donors who have just had $800,000 of their donations taken to be used in a way that they could not have foreseen, and probably do not support
• the hundreds of candidates who cannot enter into the races where some candidate is unopposed, as this court has just allowed Lautenberg to do
• the legislature of NJ whose bright-line rules have just been ignored so that an election can be unjustly set-up (the court ruled that this decision was made to block the "preventing of a name from being added" to a ballot that was not blank... and the laws mandated could not suddenly be made blank... but that didn't stop SCONJ)!
• Third-party candidates who will not get the same treatment, since this was decided to "preserve" some 'two-party system' that SCONJ is trying to enforce, but doesn't actually exist.

Any other people who have just been burned that we're forgetting?

[SteveH]

Any other people who have just been burned that we're forgetting?

• Corrupting the voting process of a federal legislative body in one state detracts from the ability of the voters in other states to see their views reflected in collective decisions made regarding legislation before that body;