[Peach]

I'm starting to feel very unprotected and don't know what we'll do if SCOTUS won't touch it or votes differently this time.

[laconic]

SCOTUS will probably not touch this theft, its simply not as compelling as the attempt by the Florida supreme court to steal the presidential election after the votes had been counted. I wish I were wrong, but give 85 percent odds that I'm right. Just remember; a 'republican', one Governor Christie Whitman appointed four of these judges and two of them (including Miss Poritz) were her attorneys general and call themselves "republicans". But then again, so did Red Harry Bridges of the Longshoreman's Union in the 1940s.

[Jim Noble]

>>I'm starting to feel very unprotected and don't know what we'll do if SCOTUS won't touch it or votes differently this time.<<

SCOTUS would be nuts to touch this with a ten foot pole.

Any Republican who thinks there is anything to be gained by an appeal is temporarily insane.

Please stop.

[mewzilla]

Well, SCOTUS better think hard on this one. Are you listening, SCOTUS? If they fail to act in a case this egregious, then the public will truly be left to the tender mercies of every sleazy pol with a roster of bought-and-paid-for judges at his beck and call. This country will be done in from within.