Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJSC Dems can replace Tori's on ballot - Pubbies appealing

Posted on 10/02/2002 2:57:31 PM PDT by Liz

Pubbies may try for stay in circuit court.


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News
KEYWORDS: stutteringbafoon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 461-463 next last
To: Dog
Im sick....My hubby and son are in the ARMY...there are thousands of young women and men overseas right now in harms way fighting for this country....fighting for our rights...our right to vote, but they are not allowed to.....Shit!
201 posted on 10/02/2002 3:45:09 PM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Bingo.
202 posted on 10/02/2002 3:45:20 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: mware
Actually, there is a problem if you've allready sent in your ballot (hint, hint). When you are "issued" your new ballot, how can you legally vote, unless there is a mechanism in place to remove your previous ballot. After all, you can't vote twice. But then again, how can you be sure that your "bad" ballot is removed?

Sounds like a federal problem to me.......

203 posted on 10/02/2002 3:45:42 PM PDT by par4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Isn't this a Federal Issue?


204 posted on 10/02/2002 3:46:04 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Liz
There are no longer any laws in the US. We no longer have to follow anything, period. The NJSC made that fact very clear by this ruling.
205 posted on 10/02/2002 3:46:14 PM PDT by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Ambrose, it's not just Lousenberg. This is about the nj dem machine. /sigh of disgust
206 posted on 10/02/2002 3:47:06 PM PDT by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Sure thing. Where is the RNC? What did they do, just turn off the lights and close the door? Why aren't they on every TV and radio in the country?
207 posted on 10/02/2002 3:47:19 PM PDT by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Smedley
BINGO, Smedley. THAT is a GREAT plan!
208 posted on 10/02/2002 3:47:57 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: McLynnan
They must have written their opinion last night. Christ, they don't even try to make it look good.
209 posted on 10/02/2002 3:47:59 PM PDT by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Brytani
You're right re no laws. Clinton started it all when he parsed the meaning of the word "is". Ann Coulter already has an article about The Torch matter.
210 posted on 10/02/2002 3:48:13 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Re#185 Oops. I misunderstood. Actually, they said very little. Pretty much just "go ahead, Rats. Make it happen." Disgusting....
211 posted on 10/02/2002 3:48:16 PM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Brytani
Mara on Fox just said the NJ RATS are polling as we speak to see how this is playing....oh are they in for a SURPRISE!!!!!!
212 posted on 10/02/2002 3:48:21 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: stlrocket
7 X
213 posted on 10/02/2002 3:48:24 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
And the Court having determined that the interests of justice require the immediate issuance of an Order disposition with the Court's opinion to follow in due course;

This means 'never', if they can get away with it. How is the hell can they justify such a decision if they have not explained the facts and the law on which they based their opinion. This decision violates the principles of due process which requires a written explanation of the decision and stating the facts and law upon which it relies.

This shit isn't going to fly with the US SC. This is an obvious attempt to side step the 51 days means something other than 51 days problem. If the US SC can issue a written decision in 1-2 days after hearing oral arguments in the Bush v. Gore cases, so can the NJ SC.

The justices on the FL SC are pikers compared to the thugs on the NJ SC.

214 posted on 10/02/2002 3:48:32 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Liz
The Decision (PDF format)
215 posted on 10/02/2002 3:48:55 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Jay Severn says that the DNC plan, that he is aware of, is that the Lautenberg will step in and get elected. Three months after the election, he will step down, and the Governor will appoint Tortonilli to the Senate. Thus the Dems will continue to control the Senate and Torti will stay in office. From what he said, the fix is in and in place.
216 posted on 10/02/2002 3:49:01 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I haven't been able to read the thread, so forgive me if this has already been said, but..........

In the end, might this not be a good thing? It stinks to high heaven and anyone can see that, but I have to assume that the reason Torricelli was behind is because even former supporters are sick of corruption. Doesn't it stand to reason that this cheating tactic by the Demoncrats will not go over well?

Why would it take votes away from Forrester or give votes to Lautenberg?

This way, a Republican can still win and the Dems have no issue.

I think it could be a positive, except for the little matter (uh-hem !!!) of judicial activism. But merely as it pertains to the November election, I think this could be a winner.

If yesterday was any example of Lautenberg's upcoming campaign, I think a monkey could beat him. He was barely coherent.

217 posted on 10/02/2002 3:49:08 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Peach; tpaine; OWK; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Mercuria; MadameAxe; redrock; Free Vulcan; ...
Considering that Republicans can't get their judges seated, it's no contest how these problems will resolve themselves in the future.

How many of these judges were appointed by a Republican?

218 posted on 10/02/2002 3:49:12 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Re 87. YES!
219 posted on 10/02/2002 3:49:40 PM PDT by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Ok, so the Demon_rat candidate loses. Then they sue in court and say, "But this election was illegal. We disobeyed the rules and you let us. We need a new election where Torch will run against Strom Thurmond. We will accept the results of that fair, legal, and binding process. Thank you and God bless America."
220 posted on 10/02/2002 3:50:13 PM PDT by Chemnitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 461-463 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson