Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mwl1
Dem. lawyer repeated this judges own previous words back to her on the importance of the voters...Eddie Haskell crossed with Clinton.

"you are asking us to allow for flexibility whenever it would be feasible...how would you ..protect the absentee voters..." Judges asking the Dem. to address specifics....looking for a way to grant the Dems wishes, imho.

83 posted on 10/02/2002 7:36:26 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: twyn1
51 day deadline was changed to get more in line with Federal rules, having to do with Absentee ballots and enough time to send and return
90 posted on 10/02/2002 7:38:19 AM PDT by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
looking for a way to grant the Dems wishes, imho.

I have that feeling, too. Talking how to address the 1600 absentee ballots that have already been returned. Judge wonders if a color coded scheme could be implemented to distinguish from the previous ballot.

I'm getting deja vu back to the Florida Supremes and their probing questions asking for a roadmap in how to accede to the dems' wishes.

98 posted on 10/02/2002 7:38:41 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
C-span's cutting into and out of the NJSC hearing. House now voting to allow churches to participate in political campaigns without losing tax-exempt status.

Back to NJ. How could the Republicans be prepared for this? We were blindsided. This Dem. lawyer has this act down cold.

114 posted on 10/02/2002 7:40:47 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson