To: TheBigB
Just a slight disagreement with you. I believe that I heard someone yesterday say that the only way this thing gets to SCOTUS is on a Voters' Rights basis. In other words, voting rights is a federal issue, which could be violated in the case of the absentee voters' already receiving ballots which will have been invalid.
102 posted on
10/02/2002 7:39:08 AM PDT by
Galtoid
To: Galtoid
...the only way this thing gets to SCOTUS is on a Voters' Rights basisThat would explain the perseveration on the absentee ballots sent in already.
To: Galtoid
Just a slight disagreement with you. I believe that I heard someone yesterday say that the only way this thing gets to SCOTUS is on a Voters' Rights basis. In other words, voting rights is a federal issue, which could be violated in the case of the absentee voters' already receiving ballots which will have been invalid. </>Have you forgotten Florida 2000? Federal rules mandate that you CANNOT change the rules in the middle of an election!
119 posted on
10/02/2002 7:41:15 AM PDT by
cinFLA
To: Galtoid
Any time a federal issue is raised, the SCOTUS can find it has jurisdiction. This is not limited to the Voting Rights Act. I think there were several laws at play (no pun intended ;-)) in Bush v. Gore. And if a federal constitutional issue can be posed, such as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, bingo.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson