Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBigB
Just a slight disagreement with you. I believe that I heard someone yesterday say that the only way this thing gets to SCOTUS is on a Voters' Rights basis. In other words, voting rights is a federal issue, which could be violated in the case of the absentee voters' already receiving ballots which will have been invalid.
102 posted on 10/02/2002 7:39:08 AM PDT by Galtoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Galtoid
...the only way this thing gets to SCOTUS is on a Voters' Rights basis

That would explain the perseveration on the absentee ballots sent in already.

110 posted on 10/02/2002 7:40:29 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Galtoid
Just a slight disagreement with you. I believe that I heard someone yesterday say that the only way this thing gets to SCOTUS is on a Voters' Rights basis. In other words, voting rights is a federal issue, which could be violated in the case of the absentee voters' already receiving ballots which will have been invalid. </>

Have you forgotten Florida 2000? Federal rules mandate that you CANNOT change the rules in the middle of an election!

119 posted on 10/02/2002 7:41:15 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Galtoid
Any time a federal issue is raised, the SCOTUS can find it has jurisdiction. This is not limited to the Voting Rights Act. I think there were several laws at play (no pun intended ;-)) in Bush v. Gore. And if a federal constitutional issue can be posed, such as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, bingo.
415 posted on 10/02/2002 8:22:34 AM PDT by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson