Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^ | 10/02/02 | TonyInOhio

Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio

New Jersey Public TV is carrying this hearing live. Click on Watch Live Online, and post what you hear, here.


Tony


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: demonrats; election; fixisin; forrester; fraud; greasetheskids; igotyourparadigm; lautenberg; ratcrimes; steal; stealingelection; toricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
To: McLynnan
Concluded with that cursed phrase, RULE OF LAW. I could hear the justices muttering "dam*, she got it on the record." LOL!
901 posted on 10/02/2002 9:31:27 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Wouldn't you have wanted her to sit down and shut up if you were trying to ramrod for the democratic party??
902 posted on 10/02/2002 9:31:29 AM PDT by KsSunflower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies]

To: twyn1
R3prestents the Conservative Party
903 posted on 10/02/2002 9:31:33 AM PDT by chris_in_nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
The Democrat Dead Voter constituancy has gained enough political clout that they can now field their own candidates, (e.g., Carnahan, Mink).
904 posted on 10/02/2002 9:31:34 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
Hahaha! Good one
905 posted on 10/02/2002 9:31:46 AM PDT by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 722 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
For what it is worth ....Rush thinks this will go to USSC
906 posted on 10/02/2002 9:32:01 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
No, they didn't. They knew that if they did, she'd nail them. This is very depressing. In the little I've heard, it sounds like the Dem fix is in.
907 posted on 10/02/2002 9:32:06 AM PDT by mondonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 898 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
>She just said the dems "flagrantly" flaunt election law. YES!

If she's a lawyer, I hope she said flagrantly flout.

908 posted on 10/02/2002 9:32:13 AM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 849 | View Replies]

To: twyn1
I think this guy just screwed up by conceding there may be circumstances where the 51 day limit can be changed. He is saying it can't be done on these facts, but I think he shouldn't have conceded that point.
909 posted on 10/02/2002 9:32:23 AM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Good, I believe federal law mandates the election date.

They're not talking about changing the election date. They're talking about changing the certification date, which is not a function of federal law.

910 posted on 10/02/2002 9:32:31 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 897 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
First words I heard out of his mouth was: This is about retaking the Senate, er, retaining the Senate...
911 posted on 10/02/2002 9:32:33 AM PDT by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
actually, according to the one of the depositions during the impeachment scandals (Lewinsky perhaps?), his "thing" is about the size of a roll of quarters.
912 posted on 10/02/2002 9:32:47 AM PDT by Cosmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
Excellent point! He isn't unwilling to serve, he is unwilling to lose, as was stated in someone's earlier post!
913 posted on 10/02/2002 9:33:00 AM PDT by KsSunflower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Go ahead, give them a call.

1-609-292-4837 (Needs to be repeated often...)

914 posted on 10/02/2002 9:33:03 AM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
But I thought Libertarians just cared about dope ;-)
915 posted on 10/02/2002 9:33:05 AM PDT by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
Someone please call the Star Ledger and Bergen Record etc and tell them that the NJSC is taking a freaking POLL!!!!! I have to go work now. Please someone get this word out. Call FOX News!!!
916 posted on 10/02/2002 9:33:08 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
There is a deadline for absolute reasons.

In Florida, Dems threw out the military ballots BECAUSE THEY CAME IN PAST THE DEADLINE. The Clinton administration mailed them too late!

917 posted on 10/02/2002 9:33:09 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
It's like the Menendez brothers killing their parents and then asking the court for mercy because they are orphans.


very well said!!
918 posted on 10/02/2002 9:33:48 AM PDT by SternTrek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Peach
If this has already been posted, I apologize. Just got back home for a few minutes and have to go out again. The New Jersey Supreme Court is taking phone calls nationally in order to "poll" on this issue. I called from the car and had a polite discussion with person who answered. Their Number is 609-292-4837. They probably won't make a decision today so calls are important. PLEASE CALL.

Thanks for the heads up. I just called. Stated that the "voters need a choice" argument is utterly bogus. The voters have the ultimate freedom to choose a candidate now: its called the "write-in" vote. Oh, I also mentioned that it is pretty pathetic that the court has to take a "poll" before deciding.

919 posted on 10/02/2002 9:33:52 AM PDT by Lil'freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
Can anyone tell me whether the two Rat judges that gave cash to The Torch recused themselves?
920 posted on 10/02/2002 9:33:53 AM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 912 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,281-1,293 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson