Skip to comments.
NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^
| 10/02/02
| TonyInOhio
Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio
New Jersey Public TV is carrying this hearing live. Click on Watch Live Online, and post what you hear, here.
Tony
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: demonrats; election; fixisin; forrester; fraud; greasetheskids; igotyourparadigm; lautenberg; ratcrimes; steal; stealingelection; toricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Judge - What happens if the Torch remains on the ballot? Judge - What happens if the Torch wins? RAT - Elected someone who cannot serve. What a weak argument. If Torricelli wins he wins, if he loses heloses. He is only claiming he cant serve, becasue he is dropping out. There is nothign to prevent him from winning except losing the election.
To: tomkat
What I cannot get over is how they just all act like the existing law is NO PROBLEM; brazen as hell.
This decision is made.
282
posted on
10/02/2002 8:07:06 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"this case presents a new paradigm" I smell "emanations and penumbras" here.
To: jackbill
It's like the Menendez brothers killing their parents and then asking the court for mercy because they are orphans.
Exactly.
To: Alberta's Child
"If you're going to change your candidate at this late date, THEN WHAT IS THE F#CKING POINT OF HAVING A PRIMARY IN THE FIRST PLACE?" And if the governor and the leading party hacks are going to decide who goes on the ballot, rather than the voters--then I second your question about the point of a primary.
285
posted on
10/02/2002 8:07:29 AM PDT
by
randita
To: Kaisersrsic
I am also sensing that the RATS are arguing for a liberal interpretation of the 51-day rule, but a strict interpretation for the 30-day rule for resigning. What hypocrites.
286
posted on
10/02/2002 8:07:46 AM PDT
by
mwl1
To: VRWC_minion
To: tractorman
Man, they are pulling out ALL the stops to get this done.
288
posted on
10/02/2002 8:07:55 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Where is the discussion of the integrity of the primary process? The court seems to have agreed where they want to go (change the ballot) and right on to whether it is "administratively feasible."
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Precisely.
290
posted on
10/02/2002 8:08:11 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: rockinonritalin
There is none.
291
posted on
10/02/2002 8:08:32 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: BillCompton
the 'good guy' just said the switch is 'administratively feasible'
folks, it's a done deal
292
posted on
10/02/2002 8:08:36 AM PDT
by
tomkat
To: Howlin
This is outrageous! Why don't the judges help the dems stuff the new absentee ballots?
293
posted on
10/02/2002 8:08:46 AM PDT
by
LisaFab
To: Howlin
AG making dems arguments for them. Bastard.
294
posted on
10/02/2002 8:08:47 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
To: randita
Faxing ballots???? What happened to the "secret ballot"?
To: Howlin
I would think the rats would have looked into this with the Judges before the pushed Torch out the door. They knew the outcome before it happened (outcome based elections, a'la Gore)
To: TonyInOhio
OMG, they're talking about faxing absentee ballots!
New levels of corruption are feasible.
To: randita
Just the fact that they have let this go on this long without tossing the Dems out on their butts makes me think this is not going to be good for the GOP.
To: Howlin
Have the Pubbies even come up yet?
299
posted on
10/02/2002 8:09:16 AM PDT
by
TheBigB
To: BeerIsGood
Sorryu, that is the NJ Attorney General. They are talking about feasibility of redoing absentee ballots..
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson