Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^ | 10/02/02 | TonyInOhio

Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio

New Jersey Public TV is carrying this hearing live. Click on Watch Live Online, and post what you hear, here.


Tony


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: demonrats; election; fixisin; forrester; fraud; greasetheskids; igotyourparadigm; lautenberg; ratcrimes; steal; stealingelection; toricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
To: 1Old Pro
The woman judge just said "Some states let them replace right up to the day before the election, can't we do that? pretty please."

I heard that. Unbelievable. She is trying to make the case for him.

141 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:24 AM PDT by txjeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
LOL, the RAT lawyer is arguing using Bush vs. Gore as a precedent!
142 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:24 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I swear, the DEMS are giving the perfect example of what is WRONG with this country.
143 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:46 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: twigs
Imagine that the candidate to be named at this late date was the carbon-copy of Torricelli. Torricelli was done in by months and months of revelations about his personal dishonesty and bribe-taking. If he only had to run a 35-day campaign, none of his wrongdoing would have come to light, and he would have won at a walk.

Torricelli was losing for a reason. Eliminating the need to campaign for an extended period impedes public scrutiny of the candidates and makes it more likely that somebody who should not be allowed to hold office can win an election before anybody knows that he is crooked.

Torricelli himself proves why this subsitution should not be allowed.

144 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:52 AM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
I think this is going very well.

for the Rats. I only see one concern being the absentee ballots and the juctices just gave them the method to circumvent the problem.

145 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:55 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: txjeep
First real softball question from a judge.
146 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:59 AM PDT by TheConservator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
I almost jumped out of my seat at that one. Why do we subject ourselves to this?

"We're asking you to broadly interpret the statute." UGH!

147 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:02 AM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
RAT say this is about "voter choice" SHEESH. Justice wants to know how much it will COST ????
148 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:04 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Oh, the Dems don't want to PAY for this.......
149 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:14 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Cost question. Listen to him weasel.
150 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:25 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
I'm with you, I'm afraid. The fix is in.
151 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:32 AM PDT by TonyInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The Democrats are overturning an election, their primary election.
152 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:37 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
LOL GMTA!
153 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:39 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: tomkat; TonyInOhio
If I was sitting at the GOP table, I would argue that the Dems gave it away when they argued that the actual time limit the Court should apply would be based upon the evidence in the case. There is no evidence before the Court.
154 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:39 AM PDT by Kaisersrsic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
'Rat lawyer asking for absentees to cast another, new, ballot if the first was already sent. Since votes aren't counted until Election Day, just count the new one.

I see multiable voting here. There will be a 150% absentee voter turnout this year.

155 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:53 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
Why do we subject ourselves to this?

If you EVER figure that out, ping me.

156 posted on 10/02/2002 7:46:00 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
I want to see some third party effort then to get another name on the ballot. Hell, if they are going to reprint everything and allow a change at this late date, then why not open it up to anyone????
157 posted on 10/02/2002 7:46:17 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
They do not, and you do not, want to encounter the wrath of the Soap Opera junkies when their show is pre-empted.

Cable news networks then, damnit! CNN showed the video while their blue-dressed biddy droned on and on and then (!) they cut away to breaking news: the end of the Anaheim car chase. What are they smoking?

158 posted on 10/02/2002 7:46:18 AM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
$730,000 cost to swap Torch ... "cost of democracy is the cost of democracy" ... who should pay? ... RAT wants taxpayers to pick up the tab
159 posted on 10/02/2002 7:46:23 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

Comment #160 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,281-1,293 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson