Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^ | 10/02/02 | TonyInOhio

Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio

New Jersey Public TV is carrying this hearing live. Click on Watch Live Online, and post what you hear, here.


Tony


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: demonrats; election; fixisin; forrester; fraud; greasetheskids; igotyourparadigm; lautenberg; ratcrimes; steal; stealingelection; toricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
DNC lawyer is getting HAMMERED ...

Don't read too much into that. Supreme Court justices routinely play devil's advocate and severely challenge the lawyers on both sides. It doesn't necessarily have any bearing on how they eventually rule.

121 posted on 10/02/2002 7:41:17 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
The motive of the vacancy (how it is caused) should play NO ROLE in your decision!!!!!!!!
122 posted on 10/02/2002 7:41:24 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
I think this is going very well.
123 posted on 10/02/2002 7:41:34 AM PDT by Kaisersrsic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
DNC lawyeRAT - 51 days does not mean 51 days.
124 posted on 10/02/2002 7:42:05 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I'm getting deja vu back to the Florida Supremes and their probing questions asking for a roadmap in how to accede to the dems' wishes.

Why am I not suprised by this.

125 posted on 10/02/2002 7:42:18 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Maybe one of the justices can ask the most relevant question of the day:

"If you're going to change your candidate at this late date, THEN WHAT IS THE F#CKING POINT OF HAVING A PRIMARY IN THE FIRST PLACE?"

Thank you -- Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.

126 posted on 10/02/2002 7:42:28 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
I think this is going very well.

It could be worse.

127 posted on 10/02/2002 7:42:32 AM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
'Rat Justice helpfully points out other states allow candidates to be replaced up to day before election. :-(
128 posted on 10/02/2002 7:42:45 AM PDT by TonyInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
I think this is going very well.

i wouldn't bet the farm on that quite yet ...

129 posted on 10/02/2002 7:42:54 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
What a travesty!
130 posted on 10/02/2002 7:42:55 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
The woman judge just said "Some states let them replace right up to the day before the election, can't we do that? pretty please."
131 posted on 10/02/2002 7:43:02 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Adversaries Federal Argument. Off to the Federal Courts.
132 posted on 10/02/2002 7:43:03 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
Thanks for the reports.

Questions don't always mean anything in a judicial hearing. The judges may just wish to bring out or clarify points of law or equity before making their decision, so no one can say they didn't consider all these issues.

Yesterday someone said here that most of these judges were appointed by Republican governors. In New Jersey that may not mean much, but perhaps it's a hopeful portent that they won't be completely corrupt and out to lunch, like the SCOFLAws or the 9th circuit judges in California.
133 posted on 10/02/2002 7:43:10 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
HOW CAN THE MAJOR NETWORKS NOT CARRY THIS LIVE? HHHMMMMPHH!

They do not, and you do not, want to encounter the wrath of the Soap Opera junkies when their show is pre-empted.

134 posted on 10/02/2002 7:43:24 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
Now discussing Federal statutes. 'Rat laywer doesn't think they are relevant.
135 posted on 10/02/2002 7:43:34 AM PDT by TonyInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
BULL ... what happen to every vote counts

The VOTERS of New Jersy picked Torricelli

That Fat Cats in the back room decided to OVER RULE the voters

/rant>
136 posted on 10/02/2002 7:43:59 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
Dur Process arguments coming.
137 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:10 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Justice asking about Bush v. Gore...perhaps worried about the stinging rebuke the SCOFLAw got, and wanting to avoid similar treatment?
138 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:10 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
LawyeRAT not comparing Bush v Gore and federal law ...
139 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:11 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Adversaries Federal Argument. Off to the Federal Courts.

From your keys to God's ears!

140 posted on 10/02/2002 7:44:14 AM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,281-1,293 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson