Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
They are still based upon precedent, albeit bad ones, such as Miller

Makes my point, really. Claim to cite Miller and just make a decision out of whole cloth that has nothing to do with the cited case.

That is soooooo Democratic.

I hope your take prevails.

269 posted on 10/01/2002 7:30:33 PM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]


To: MileHi
Makes my point, really. Claim to cite Miller and just make a decision out of whole cloth that has nothing to do with the cited case.

And IMO the SCONJ doesn't even have the equivalent of Miller to cite here - they have one case where the guy died and the NJ courts allowed someone else on the ballot. Toricelli can still legally take the Senate seat if he were elected. We'll have to see what SCONJ values more - it's reputation or its political affiliation.

280 posted on 10/01/2002 7:36:13 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson