That court being the 2nd Circuit, not the the USSC. You're aware that they aren't the same court?
The decision, and the decisions it referenced, lay to rest the lunatic contention that guns are subject to being outlawed because illicit drugs are.
Your argument lies smoking on the ground.
Really? So the federal government no longer has the authority to prohibit posession of a sawed off shotgun under the Commerce Clause?
No . . . you're sh*tting me . . . really?The decision, and the decisions it referenced, lay to rest the lunatic contention that guns are subject to being outlawed because illicit drugs are. Your argument lies smoking on the ground.
No. The decision laid to rest the fact that possessing a gun did not equate to a form of COMMERCE which the federal government could regulate.I stand by my assessment that wannabe lawyers like you are an opposing attorney's wet dream.