No . . . you're sh*tting me . . . really?The decision, and the decisions it referenced, lay to rest the lunatic contention that guns are subject to being outlawed because illicit drugs are. Your argument lies smoking on the ground.
No. The decision laid to rest the fact that possessing a gun did not equate to a form of COMMERCE which the federal government could regulate.I stand by my assessment that wannabe lawyers like you are an opposing attorney's wet dream.
It held that the Lopez standard does NOT apply to illicit drugs.