Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
That court being the 2nd Circuit, not the the USSC. You're aware that they aren't the same court?

No . . . you're sh*tting me . . . really?

The decision, and the decisions it referenced, lay to rest the lunatic contention that guns are subject to being outlawed because illicit drugs are. Your argument lies smoking on the ground.

No. The decision laid to rest the fact that possessing a gun did not equate to a form of COMMERCE which the federal government could regulate.

I stand by my assessment that wannabe lawyers like you are an opposing attorney's wet dream.


153 posted on 10/01/2002 10:54:54 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: Hemingway's Ghost
The decision laid to rest the fact that possessing a gun did not equate to a form of COMMERCE which the federal government could regulate.

It held that the Lopez standard does NOT apply to illicit drugs.

164 posted on 10/01/2002 11:10:01 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson