Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting article.
1 posted on 09/30/2002 2:53:58 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: vannrox; rightwing2; Alamo-Girl; Physicist; OKCSubmariner
Indeed. It figures that there would have been an outright BAN on this type of research before the democRATS were evicted from Congress. It wouldn't have happened to be during the lame duck session, eh?
2 posted on 09/30/2002 3:08:37 PM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Fascinating! Thanks for posting it.
3 posted on 09/30/2002 3:18:42 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
-Ready for `Mini-nukes`? --
4 posted on 09/30/2002 3:56:48 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Nelson cautions that if it were used to root out terrorists near a major Third World city such as Baghdad, the casualties could be in the hundreds of thousands.

It's tough to see a downside in that...

5 posted on 09/30/2002 4:56:07 PM PDT by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
The last paragraph of the article got cut off.

The test, referred to as Sulky, was part of an effort to explore the use of small nuclear warheads for massive earthmoving projects, such as digging a wider replacement for the Panama Canal. A tiny 0.1-kiloton warhead was detonated 89 ft. below ground. As the photo on the previous page indicates, blast damage was confined to the area above the explosion. The presence of an escaping plume of radioactive iodine was, however, not revealed until years later. AEC tracking stations in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming reported radiation from the small underground blast. While the amounts were small, their existence serves as a reminder that physical and political fallout will be an inescapable consequence of even the smallest nuclear deterrent.

6 posted on 09/30/2002 4:59:13 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Tiny Nukes - America's first-strike nuclear weapons

"You can run.
You can hide.
You can dig a very deep hole and fortify it.
But you'll just die more tired than if you'd just run and tried to hide conventionally."
7 posted on 09/30/2002 6:39:02 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Tiny Nukes - America's first-strike nuclear weapons

Just in time to make it into the Niemann-Marcus Christmas catalog.

Showing your friends a tiny nuke on your mantle instead of those old, tired
vintage British double-barreled shotguns or a Pennsylvania long rifle...
pretty cool.
8 posted on 09/30/2002 6:41:55 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Tiny Bubbles............. Sorry, it just keep running through my head.
9 posted on 09/30/2002 6:55:10 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
bump
11 posted on 09/30/2002 9:06:48 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
We really need to add a little bit more curvature to our Wallet Sized Nukes !!!

These damned things get rather irritating after sitting for only a minute or two!!! ;-))

12 posted on 09/30/2002 9:26:26 PM PDT by GeekDejure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson