Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX News..GOP Ready Tomorrow With New Jersey Election Lawsuit
FOX News ^ | September 30, 2002 | Linda Vester

Posted on 09/30/2002 12:46:18 PM PDT by tip of the sword

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:34:48 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

FOX just reported that the paperwork will be ready to go on the New Jersey funny business and rigging elections.

Depending of course if the Torch goes throught with the resignation from the campaign or U.S. Senate.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; gop; lawsuit; newjersey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: cake_crumb
Voter disenfranchizement.

disinfranchised voters are voters in any election that a Republican wins.

21 posted on 09/30/2002 12:55:25 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tip of the sword
What does this do to the senate right now?
22 posted on 09/30/2002 12:55:36 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdontom
This statute does not permit the extension of the constitutionally-mandated senate term. And, even if it could be argued that way, it would not be upheld.

The United States Code mandates that the federal general elections be held on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. 2 USC §1, 7. The United States Constitution proscribes six-year terms of office and the placement of seats in specific classes mandating the end of their terms. US Const. Art I §3(1) & (2).

The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the Times, Place and Manner clause as mandating the November general election and held that any conflicting state stautes are inoperative so far as the conflict extends. Foster v. Love, 532 US 67, 118 SC 464, 139 LE2d 369 (1997).

23 posted on 09/30/2002 12:55:43 PM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tip of the sword
Yes, we are on top of it but there is no time for a legal battle IMHO. This reminds me of the Ashcroft debacle when a dead democrat was legally elected.

The democrat party is without morality or shame. All these things are overlooked for the power that is so important so that they can change the world as they percieve it. It is a (Taliban like) religion to them.

I will watch with amusement and a touch of disgust, fear and concern for these United States of America.

24 posted on 09/30/2002 12:56:00 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdontom
Woah woah woah...lemme get this straight. Toricelli knows he has no chance of winning, so he decides to step down, knowing full well that the Governor can appoint a replacement that will fill the position until the NEXT election?

Am I reading this right? Are the Dems THAT afraid of losing their power, that they'd go to such underhanded techniques?
25 posted on 09/30/2002 12:56:46 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
"Good thing those corrupt slimeball bastards of the NJ GOP did their best to undercut Brett Schundler's campaign. Oh my, how the dynamics would change if Schundler were governor now, instead of McGreevey."

Yep! You've got it! I hope this gets some publicity. The NJGOP has to take some blame on this.

26 posted on 09/30/2002 12:57:05 PM PDT by Exit148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
I don't consider a corpse as "residing" in the state they are elected.

I think it is disrespectful and insensitive to refer to Congresswoman Mink as a corpse.

I prefer to think that she's finally attained "Good Liberal" status.

As in "the only good liberal is a ........"

27 posted on 09/30/2002 12:57:23 PM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
The DNC has a fundraising concert scheduled on October 9 at the Warner Theatre in DC and the theme is "Every Vote Counts." It appears that that might not be the case with military votes, votes in certain Florida counties or in the upcoming NJ election for Senator.
28 posted on 09/30/2002 12:57:24 PM PDT by Angelwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA
The thirty-day time limit is for appointing someone to serve the remainder of the term. A separate New Jersey statute prescribes that ballot replacements for general elections must be done 48 days before the election (which has already passed).
29 posted on 09/30/2002 12:57:46 PM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Can the dims actually do this? How are they going to get the New Jersey Supreme Court to stop printing the ballots?
30 posted on 09/30/2002 12:58:03 PM PDT by tip of the sword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Not to mention the fiasco in Hawaii, where some are saying that Rep. Mink (D of course) was kept on life support long enough so that her name couldn't be removed from the ballot. She was pronounced dead just 2 days after the deadline had passed.
31 posted on 09/30/2002 12:58:56 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon Fan
Nothing. We never had the majority before-- just a tie without Cheney. We now go back to a tie, with Cheney (which doesn't count).
32 posted on 09/30/2002 12:59:06 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jdontom
It looks as if the Demorat governor can appoint someone to fill Toricelli's seat after the 30 day marker, and no election would be held for that seat until NEXT term.

Under New Jersey law. This law, however, is a massive violation of the Seventeenth Amendment to the US Constitution, and it will be overturned if the RATS attempt it.

33 posted on 09/30/2002 1:00:09 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
We're gonna end up looking like the bad guys AGAIN!
34 posted on 09/30/2002 1:00:14 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
OMG what are we becoming if this is true? This can't be allowed to stand.
35 posted on 09/30/2002 1:00:26 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Southack
"... This will soon become a national public relations disaster for the greedy Democrats who simply don't want to let the public have their fair vote."

On the other hand, this is New Jersey we're talking about.

36 posted on 09/30/2002 1:00:40 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tip of the sword
They control the state SC. It's one of the most liberal in the country.
37 posted on 09/30/2002 1:00:50 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tip of the sword
The DemoRats thought they'd pull a fast one on the American people, first by whitewashing Torch's crimes in the secret Ethics procedure, then by a campaign of personal destruction against Torch's extortion victim. Now they see the People aren't buying it and want to change candidates at the last moment. They damned well better lose this contest or it will encourage more such corruption at the highest levels of our government.
38 posted on 09/30/2002 1:00:53 PM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: writmeister
This statute does not permit the extension of the constitutionally-mandated senate term. And, even if it could be argued that way, it would not be upheld.

Exactly. Federal law trumps state law. The term cannot be extended. New Jersey's governor can appoint someone for the REMAINDER of Torricelli's term, i.e. through January 3, 2003. No longer. Torricelli's term was 6 years, not 6 years plus whatever the governor of New Jersey wants to add to it . . .

39 posted on 09/30/2002 1:01:03 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tip of the sword
I imagine the legal battle is over whether a new name can be on the ballot. A battle over postponing the election wouldn't require a response. Its not going to happen.
40 posted on 09/30/2002 1:01:33 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson