Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mongrel
I know the precedent, I'm just nodding my head in amazement again that people can get away with running a "fill in the blank candidate." Why not just do this all the time -- just run party slots and fill in the candidate after we see which party is chosen?

It has to be illegal because people are voting for representatives, not draft picks to be designated at a later date. What that is doing is delegating the selection of a representative to one individual, not the constituency at large, even if they are complicit in the choosing. And, in fact, they are not complicit in the choosing because those who voted for an opposing candidate did not vote to have a blank voted in, they voted for a live, breathing body. Even if their candidate loses, they went to the polls expecting to vote for a known candidate who campaigned, also expecting other voters to go to the polls and do the same. So, even if one side plays wink-wink-nod-nod, they are corrupting the process for everyone who goes to the polls.

-PJ

1,927 posted on 09/30/2002 6:07:36 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1912 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too
I agree with you, and I hope it doesn't work. But I believe it will.
1,929 posted on 09/30/2002 6:08:54 PM PDT by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1927 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson