Posted on 09/29/2002 1:43:16 PM PDT by MadIvan
UK Prime Minister Tony Blair says President Saddam Hussein of Iraq will be disarmed, one way or the other.
Mr Blair told the BBC there was no disagreement about two essentials - that Saddam Hussein posed a threat, and that he had to be disarmed. The only question was the best way of doing it.
He was speaking as Britain and the United States try to secure backing from other members of the UN Security Council for a tough new resolution on Iraq.
A senior UK official is in Beijing for talks with Chinese officials, following visits by American and British envoys to Paris and Moscow.
Iraq says US jets have bombed the civilian airport in the city of Basra, attacking passenger terminals and the radar system.
'Confident'
Mr Blair said Saddam Hussein had one choice.
"If he wants to avoid conflict he needs to do what the international community is saying," he told the Breakfast with Frost programme.
Asked if Britain would act - along with the United States - if the UN failed to endorse military action against Iraq, Mr Blair did not answer directly.
But he said that the Iraqi leader would be forced to give up his weapons of mass destruction, in any event.
Mr Blair said he was confident that the United Nations would endorse a strong resolution against Iraq.
The resolution drafted by the US and Britain demands "full, final and complete destruction" of Iraq's suspected weapons of mass destruction. It would let UN inspectors to roam freely around the country.
If Iraq failed to comply with any aspect of the resolution's demands, the draft says "all necessary means" could be used against it - a diplomatic term for military force.
Mr Blair was speaking on the opening day of the annual conference of his Labour Party - which is divided on the use of force against Iraq.
The BBC's Nicholas Jones at the conference says a big anti-war demonstration in London on Saturday has encouraged delegates who want the conference to say that Britain must not join an American attack unless it is authorised by the UN.
Support withheld
As Mr Blair spoke, British envoy William Ehrman was in Beijing to try to secure Chinese approval for the British-American draft resolution.
Although China has said Baghdad should comply with disarmament resolutions, it has also said that any attack not backed by the Security council would have incalculable consequences.
The diplomatic offensive has already taken American and British envoys to Paris and Moscow, although there has been no clear message of support from either capital.
Speaking after meeting US and British officials on Saturday, Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov declined to comment on the draft.
He merely said Moscow favoured "the quickest possible return of UN weapons inspectors to Iraq".
The envoys also made little headway on Friday in Paris, where President Jacques Chirac said he continued to support a two-step approach.
Russia, France and China - as permanent members of the Security Council - have the right of veto over any resolution.
One way or another, I'm gonna find ya
I'm gonna get cha, get cha get cha, get cha
One way or another, I'm gonna win ya
I'm gonna get cha, get cha get cha, get cha
With you at the first, with you to the last.
Regards, Ivan
``Lost inside Adorable illusion and I cannot hide''
Best Regards, Ivan
Frost asked Blair if he thought Gore was right about America having squandered international goodwill. Blair replied with a rueful smirk and said that he had enough politics at home to worry about to be concerned with that in another country.
Meaning, he doesn't take that criticism seriously, second, he views it as partisan bickering on Gore's part.
Regards, Ivan
Apart from Australia, Canada, Israel and Italy...good luck.
Regards, Ivan
Still, it's great to have one true friend of the U.S. in this uncertain world.
It was indeed subtle. But no politician, really, in Blair's position could come right out and say "Gore is a prat".
Regards, Ivan
Clinton in saying that is to help Blair sell the Iraq policy to the left of the Labour Party. However the left of the Labour Party utterly hates Clinton.
Another disrupter is Scott Ritter - he's in Blackpool inciting the far left of Labour. Would you lot PLEASE keep him to yourselves.
Regards, Ivan
Why doesn't he just stay in Iraq, along with the Three Stooges. I'm sure Saddam would set them up nicely.
Would you say that -- behind the scenes -- we are taking three action steps foward for every sentence uttered publicly? That's my hope anyway.
P.S. To James LEONARD Pyke: sign up, dude.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.