Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three big powers tell US it's wrong on Iraq
Herald ^ | September 30, 2002 | Caroline Overington

Posted on 09/29/2002 12:50:10 PM PDT by Torie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: MadIvan
Ivan, did you clear that with that guy down under yet? LOL
41 posted on 09/29/2002 4:52:41 PM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SBeck
No, but I am aware at how skittish the administration gets when dealing with China, or have we already forgotten the Orion incident already? Incidentally, did we ever get our plane back?

Yes, the administration got the plane and the crew back and resumed the surveillance flights inspite of China's demand they stop....
... announced a robust arms sales package for Taiwan and vowed to do "whatever it takes" to defend the island from attack by China.
....has resumed military cooperation with India including in areas of missile defense and recent Naval exercises all of which are aimed at containing China.
This administration has in fact increase ties and military presense with countries literally surrounding China.

42 posted on 09/29/2002 6:05:00 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Pardon me, but how exactly is France a "big power"???
43 posted on 09/29/2002 6:10:05 PM PDT by RebelDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelDawg
It hasn't the largest land area in Europe outside Russia. It has nukes, and it has arrogance. I hope that helps. It also holds a security council veto.
44 posted on 09/29/2002 6:12:47 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Ooooh, nukes. I'm shaken in my boots here.... I guess that makes Pakistan a big power to you as well then???

But seriously when is the last time that France flexed it's "big power"??? Does it have any power? Russia and China are or at least were recent military powers. Where does the French military fall on the scale of things? Please do tell.
45 posted on 09/29/2002 6:17:35 PM PDT by RebelDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I understand they have veto power but that does not make them a "big power". The term "Big Power" implies military might. It implies you better listen to what we have to say because we have the means to back it up. This is not France...

France definitely is NOT a "big power". Anus of the world, yes... but "big power", no.
46 posted on 09/29/2002 6:22:21 PM PDT by RebelDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
United Nations = Untied Antinos
47 posted on 09/29/2002 6:26:45 PM PDT by slimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RebelDawg
The Ten Armies You Don't Want to Fight

Taking into account quantity and quality, the ten most deadly armies on the planet belong to China, the United States, India, Russia, North Korea, South Korea, Turkey, Israel, Pakistan and Iran. America isn't on top because, while our ground forces are formidable, superior equipment and training go only so far to make up for the numerical advantage the Chinese have.
I'm still searching for something more reliable than this but for now this clip from an article will have to do. And... as you can see France isn't even on the list. Turkey and Pakistan both rank above France. In fact France was ranked below both Taiwan and Vietnam on the list...

"Big Power" my behind!
48 posted on 09/29/2002 6:29:23 PM PDT by RebelDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Relevant or Irrelevant.

We have our final answer.

49 posted on 09/29/2002 6:32:46 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Russia, France and China

Three big powers......(laughing hysterically).............Larry, Moe and Curly.

50 posted on 09/29/2002 6:34:13 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The Chinese Premier, Zhu Rongji, said China had "respect for Iraq's sovereignty and territorial integrity".

"If the weapons inspections do not take place, if we do not have clear proof and if we do not have the authorisation of the Security Council, we cannot launch a military attack on Iraq," he said.

Just remember that when it comes to Taiwan, my bellicose communist friend.

51 posted on 09/29/2002 6:38:31 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelDawg
It's funny... I have found several other lists placing France in 11th, 13th or even lower position, but on a french website I found this:
France is the world's third military power (after the US and Russia), and has the world's second largest defense industry (i.e. exocet missiles, radar technology.)
The arrogant bastards do think highly of themselves...
52 posted on 09/29/2002 6:40:12 PM PDT by RebelDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The United States was last night considering the implications of leading an attack on Iraq without the support of Russia, France and China

...oh, and by the way, how many of the previously mentioned countries do we need to stomp Iraq into the ground.

Answer: None.

Question:

How many of these countries hate the United States because of its great strength, a strength built on principles that are alien to all of the above?

Yep, all three.

53 posted on 09/29/2002 6:42:54 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelDawg; Torie
If I may, there is a reason why they are France, China, and Russia..........

......we have no need to feel ashamed of being number one. This is the mindset being inculcated by leftists the world over.

We never were like them.......until recently. This 'global citizen' nonsense has always been patently anti-American; we didn't build a system based on the European way of doing things. We set up a new system, one that shunned and despised the 'old way' of doing things.

There is no reason for any American to feel any guilt about shedding these things like an old coat.

54 posted on 09/29/2002 6:53:03 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: egarvue
Sheesh, you'd think these pitiful countries would understand the cold, hard logic of our utter superiority by now.

We are, vastly.

.....and there is no reason why we should ever subjugate ourselves to this gang of three.

Another poster posed some time ago.........imagine the world without the United States.

That's right, take a look around at what you've got, and picture it all under the control of some Chi-com despot, Putin, of some weak-kneed French socialist.

It doesn't take much imagination.

.........and these folks would suppose that they have some 'lesson' in government that they would enlighten us with.

55 posted on 09/29/2002 6:58:31 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The United States was last night considering the implications of leading an attack on Iraq without the support of Russia, France and China, after all three rejected a US draft plan for dealing with President Saddam Hussein.

That's fine. Let them sit on the sidelines and we'll demonstrate how ineffectual, weak, and irrelevantthey are.

56 posted on 09/29/2002 7:00:31 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
On Cspan it is the Tory shadow foreign minister, Hogg, that is taking the most pacifist line on Iraq. He is worried about the dismemberment of Iraq, the immunity of it all, unleashing Sharon, the evils of abandoning deterence for a preemptive strike, and the evils of going to war unless the case is overwhelming that it is necessary, and that public opinion is overwhelmingly in favor. The Tory party is dead. It has no further relevance. I suspect Britain will evolve into a two party system with Labor on the right, and the Liberals on the left. Cheers.
57 posted on 09/29/2002 7:01:22 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
The Chinese Premier, Zhu Rongji, said China had "respect for Iraq's sovereignty and territorial integrity".

Sometimes I get the feeling that when the US invades Iraq, we are going to find things out about China that are going to make us really angry.

58 posted on 09/29/2002 7:07:14 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Washington's lone supporter among permanent members of the council is Britain.

Britain needs to recapture that Churchillian spirit. Britain needs to remember that they are an island, and to thank God for being an island.

59 posted on 09/29/2002 7:13:09 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelDawg
America isn't on top because, while our ground forces are formidable, superior equipment and training go only so far to make up for the numerical advantage the Chinese have.

The numerical advantage of ground forces is almost meaningless in modern warfare. The logistical problems of projecting power by moving and sustaining enormous numbers of troops doesn't match the technology and superior power of the American military.
China doesn't come close to matching the USA.

60 posted on 09/29/2002 7:15:37 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson