Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
Interesting. I guess my question is how the fetus can move without brain waves. But the Easterbrook article said not brain waves until close to the end of the first trimester as I recall.
31 posted on 09/29/2002 11:23:09 AM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
Interesting. I guess my question is how the fetus can move without brain waves.

A chicken with its head cut off my look rather lively, but that doesn't make it any less dead.

I find even early-term abortios disturbing, but given the status quo (abortion on demand any time for any reason) I think it's best to work on convincing people at a 39-week fetus deserves protection. Don't agree that a 38-week fetus doesn't, but agree to put off discussion of the 38-week fetus until there's concensus on the 39-week one. Once concensus has been reached on the 39-week one, then work on the 38-week one, again putting off discussion of the 37-week one.

If Republicans were smart, they could probably use a strategy like the above to significantly reduce society's acceptance of abortion over the next 25 years or so, and would actually gain votes at the polls for doing so. Their current wishy-washy stance costs them votes while netting nearly nothing in the way of useful results.

39 posted on 09/29/2002 11:34:59 AM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson