[Demidog]

and you've now conceded this point for BOTH bills by pointing out that you think that Bush liked OTHER things in the most recent bill to make it worth signing

I've been talking about the same bill. The one YOU brought up several posts back, making the point that it was attached to a homeland security bill. I claimed right from the beginning that he only signed it because of the homeland security issues. You haven't cited either of the alleged bills.

[Southack]

"I claimed right from the beginning that he only signed it because of the homeland security issues. You haven't cited either of the alleged bills."

By referring to the one bill in question, you concede that it exists by default (so no source is necessary). To ask for a source from ME after YOU have pontificated about the first bill is a pretty lame delaying tactic, unworthy of serious consideration or respect.