[Demidog]

You keep digging yourself a deeper hole.

Yeah. I quoted Ridge after you said I only quoted "press lackeys."

You've been claiming that Magaw's firing was solely based on his opposition to Bush's real opinion. You didn't know that Ridge, Minetta and FAA administrator Jane Garvey were also saying similar things. When I quote Bush himself showing that he thinks there are better ways? You ignore it.

You keep defending Bush in spite of the fact that all of the evidence runs against your position.

[Southack]

"When I quote Bush himself showing that he thinks there are better ways? You ignore it. You keep defending Bush in spite of the fact that all of the evidence runs against your position."

Nonsense! All of the evidence obliterates your bizarre claims that Bush "opposed" arming pilots. Evidence? Evidence is something tangible such as SIGNING TWO pro-gun arming-pilots bills! Evidence is FIRING Magaw, the bureaucrat who held up in red tape the implimentation of the first pro-gun-pilot law.

Nor did I "ignore" what you said about Bush. In fact, I showed you that Bush's view about being "open to better ways" did NOT support your wild-eyed claim that Bush was opposed to arming pilots. That's hardly "ignoring" what you said.

What's missing, however, is any evidence to contradict what I said at the very first (that you would at BEST only be able to show non-Bush sources claiming that Bush opposed arming pilots).

[Southack]

"Yeah. I quoted Ridge after you said I only quoted "press lackeys." - Demidog

Is that where you claimed that I was lying, or am I mistaken?