"No...you lied about Magaw. You implied that he was fired for disagreeing with Bush. Post your source."
Nonsense. It's YOUR bizarre claim that needs a source. You claimed that Bush opposed arming pilots. You cited Magaw as saying that Bush opposed arming them, then had the gall to ask who Magaw worked for. Well, Bush fired Magaw AND signed two pro-gun pilot-arming bills.
That's hardly the stuff that would support your wild-eyed claim that Bush opposed arming pilots!
Ergo, it is YOU who needs to post a source to substantiate your claim, and you can't do it.
Ergo, it is YOU who needs to post a source to substantiate your claim, and you can't do it. I already posted numerous sources that you claimed didn't exist. Magaw represented Bush. Fact. You still haven't provided a source for the two bills you claim exist. And you haven't posted even one source showing Bush disagreeing with Magaw on the issue. Thus we must assume that Magaw was acting on behalf of his boss, George Bush.