Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush, GOP, up in Harris poll
UPI ^ | Published 9/27/2002 8:16 PM | From the Life & Mind Desk

Posted on 09/27/2002 7:36:34 PM PDT by luv2ndamend

WASHINGTON, Sept. 27 (UPI) -- The ratings of President George W. Bush and the Republicans have improved sharply as the nation's focus moves from domestic issues to a preemptive war with Iraq, terrorism and national security, a new Harris poll has found.

"The public has responded positively to the president's leadership," wrote Harris Interactive Chairman Humphrey Taylor in a summary.

Between Sept. 19 and 23, the Harris Poll conducted a nationwide telephone survey of a cross-section of 1,011 adults. The results, released on Friday, show that Bush's ratings have risen from 63 percent to 68 percent positive in August, with 37 percent negative now down to 30 percent.

Vice President Dick Cheney's ratings showed an even greater improvement -- from 45 percent positive and 43 percent negative in August to 52 percent positive and 37 percent negative now.

The ratings of congressional Republicans have gone up from 41 percent positive to 47 percent positive while 49 percent negative has been reduced to 42 percent negative. The ratings of the Democrats in Congress have also improved, but less so, from 38 percent positive to 42 percent positive, and 54 percent negative becoming 49 percent.

Taylor interprets these figures -- with the GOP winning more positive support than negative criticism, and the Democrats receiving higher negative ratings -- as encouraging signs for the Republicans as the November elections approach.

The scores of several Cabinet secretaries have changed little since August.

Secretary of State Colin Powell -- with 75 percent positive, 18 percent negative ratings -- continues to rank highest of all U.S. political leaders.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's ratings are also little changed at 61 percent positive and 27 percent negative.

Attorney General John Ashcroft's ratings, at 52 percent positive and 32 percent negative, also are almost the same as they were last month.

The pollsters could find no particular events that account for the improvement in the rather poor ratings of Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill -- which rose to 38 percent positive from 33 percent in August, while negative ratings dropped from 38 percent that month to 30 percent positive now.

The ratings of Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., (38 percent positive, 38 percent negative) also are significantly better than they were last month (34 percent positive, 43 percent negative). However, the poll was taken before Daschle's recent criticism of the president.

When respondents are asked to rank the most important issues for the government to address, without being shown any list or being prompted, the economy continues to top the list at 28 percent, but this is down somewhat from its score in July and August (33 percent and 32 percent).

The next four issues, however, are terrorism (24 percent), the "war" (14 percent), Iraq/Saddam Hussein (14 percent) and national security (12 percent).

Copyright © 2002 United Press International


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Robert_Paulson2
"I look for chaffee to jump, if we only gain one. "

McLame too. He has the integrity if a worm!
21 posted on 09/27/2002 8:38:32 PM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
Ok, honestly Lincoln Chaffee is the only senator who might switch. Chaffee's ACU rating was in the 40's (compared to a 29 from Jeffords last year.) Specter, Collins, and Snowe will all stay in the GOP (they all scored in the 50's or 60's). I'm not saying that Chaffee will switch, but he's the only one that might.
22 posted on 09/27/2002 8:44:30 PM PDT by afuturegovernor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Just "one" seat means that guys like Chaffee and McCain will have a field day keeping the party hostage.
23 posted on 09/27/2002 8:47:21 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: afuturegovernor
And for reference, Feinstein got a 30 ACU rating a few years back, unless my memory is totally shot.

24 posted on 09/27/2002 8:48:08 PM PDT by Tony in Hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tony in Hawaii
Yes, I believe your correct.
25 posted on 09/27/2002 8:51:59 PM PDT by afuturegovernor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PianoMan
Lou Harris himself is a long-time Democrat. I believe that his wife is related to some prominent Democrat, but I can't remember whom, perhaps Hubert Humphrey, but probably not. I think Harris polls usually overstate Democrat strength.
26 posted on 09/27/2002 8:54:10 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
The next four issues, however, are terrorism (24 percent), the "war" (14 percent), Iraq/Saddam Hussein (14 percent) and national security (12 percent).

These are all the same issue. War on Terror - 64% Economy - 28%.

27 posted on 09/27/2002 8:56:59 PM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
Nonsense. It is still more than a month away.

The media will start focusing on teh economy again and drill it in that the GOP is responsible for the bad economy.

But, we still have a shot at regaining the Senate...just barely. It won't be 1994.
28 posted on 09/27/2002 9:12:31 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
If the Republicans get a majority of 51-49 (Jeffords with Dems), I don't believe that both Chaffee, McCain, Snowe, etc will jump. If the Dems give away that many Chairmanships, what's the purpose of being in the majority.
29 posted on 09/27/2002 9:13:19 PM PDT by ssantomaur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
funny...rof
30 posted on 09/27/2002 9:14:28 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
we only need ONE senate seat and Daschle, Hillary, Kennedy and the rest of the socialist crowd will be spending the Christmas season cleaning out their desks

Oh, I had forgotten that....she'd have to give up her SPECIAL OFFICE, wouldn't she? All the more reason to vote GOP!

31 posted on 09/27/2002 9:16:17 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
I don't really think Snowe would jump. I know she's liberal; but she did support the President in the election (I know, so did Jeffords), but she does go along with the Pres. on many things. Also, if she was going to jump; wouldn't she have done it when Jeffords did? Has she threatened to jump, and I've missed it?

I seemed to remember her saying she was surprised, or dismayed when Jeffords jumped, but I can't remember exactly what she said. I have a feeling that if anyone jumps; it would be L. Chaffee.
32 posted on 09/27/2002 9:40:42 PM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
I have not seen the Dems this flustered since the days after their toss out in 1994. I think the Dem old timers smell trouble.
33 posted on 09/27/2002 9:43:10 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I think Harris polls usually overstate Democrat strength.

ALL polls overstate Democrat strength. It's a well-documented phenomenon, though nobody has proven why. The most likely reason is sheer PC: Lots of people are still afraid to admit to others that they're conservative, but they sure pull the GOP levers in the voting booth.

34 posted on 09/27/2002 9:43:19 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
Why aren't Cheney's numbers higher? He is doing a fantastic job, and his input is very beneficial.

My guess is that it's a case of "out of sight, out of mind". He's been keeping a low profile, and some Americans have VERY short term memories!

35 posted on 09/27/2002 9:45:25 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
The media will start focusing on teh economy again and drill it in that the GOP is responsible for the bad economy.

They won't be able to. The war drums are getting louder, and they're not going to take a break for the last month of the campaign. The RATS are finally going to get their October Surprise, and it's going to happen without a single shot being fired. The month of October is going to be almost entirely horse-race talk and war negotiations and buildup. Besides, the public has said time and again that they do NOT blame Bush for the wobbly economy, which is almost unheard of going into a midterm election, and which is the basis for the old "party in power loses seats in off years" canard. (History always repeats itself in politics, until it doesn't.)

Is it going to be 1994? Doubtful, though hardly anyone in 1994 was expecting 1994 to happen either. But we will retake the Senate, by a wide enough margin to make any potential Benedict Arnolds irrelevant, and we'll make meaningful gains in the House.

36 posted on 09/27/2002 9:49:41 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Is it going to be 1994? Doubtful, though hardly anyone in 1994 was expecting 1994 to happen either. But we will retake the Senate, by a wide enough margin to make any potential Benedict Arnolds irrelevant, and we'll make meaningful gains in the House.

let's be careful. Sure it feels good to talk like this now, but remember '98? Wasn't that the first mid-term election that the Prez's party won seats since 1934? And no one was expecting that. It seams our mid-term elections are pretty much the opposite of what we're expecting.

My prediction (based on the last 2 mid-term elections are we will either win really big (like '94 big) or we will barely lose the house and senate.

Right now I'm leaning toward we are going to lose. I just think the RAT base is going to be more energized. I pray that I'm wrong, but I've been burned before ('98).

37 posted on 09/27/2002 10:15:18 PM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
I look for chaffee to jump, if we only gain one.

My guess: Toricelli loses. Carnahan loses. Chaffee jumps. Snowe holds. We win.

38 posted on 09/27/2002 10:18:36 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
I can understand these numbers, except for one. Why aren't Cheney's numbers higher? He is doing a fantastic job, and his input is very beneficial. His rating should be high like Rummy's (my favorite).

He's been low profile. A behind the scenes operator. Most people don't understand the value he is providing.

39 posted on 09/27/2002 10:21:27 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
We need a comfortable margin cause Chafee is going to switch.
40 posted on 09/27/2002 10:52:59 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson