Skip to comments.
Coulter Takes on Colmes
Fox News
| 9/27/02
| Aquinasfan
Posted on 09/27/2002 6:11:43 PM PDT by Aquinasfan
Coulter: "We have to take out weapons of mass destruction and Hussein."
Colmes: "Just weapons of mass destruction. We have a policy of not targeting heads of government."
Coulter: "Well that's typical for the treason lobby"
Colmes: "The what?"
Coulter:"What about Milosevic?"
Colmes: "It's never been our policy to take out heads of government."
Coulter:"Answer my question. What about Milosevic."
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: colmes; coulter; hannityandcolmes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Aquinasfan
Just weapons of mass destruction. We have a policy of not targeting heads of government." I think he actually said we have a policy of not targeting individuals.
Aside from Milosevic, I wanted her to say "Why don't you go down to Noreiga's jail cell and ask him about the US targeting individuals".
To: Paul Atreides
IYO what would have been more desirable, to feverishly challenge the Clinton Admin or go along?
To: Alas Babylon!
Saddam is the problem, not his weapons. Great Brittan and France have weapons of mass destruction, but no serious thinking person worries about France launching an unporvoked nuke at someone.You remind me of Ann. You went straight to the point, no extraneous BS.
To: MichiganCheese
I'm not sure why they think that being ant-American will bring them votes from Americans in November. It won't and they know it. That is why they don't want to vote until after the election. But this(their reason for not wanting to vote now) is now out in the open.
I heard it reported as such on my local liberal station this morning. If they are reporting it then the whole world knows it. And that can backfire drastically.
a.cricket
To: Liberty Teeth
I realize there is a certain amount of working with the enemy, in politics. That said, there are some Republicans who cannot go on a talk show and call a spade, a spade. If they even hint that Bubba and Hillary are dishonest, the liberal host will act shocked and say "Are you saying that the President lied?!", and the Republican will chuckle nervously and sit there backtracking. I get sick of Dims calling Republicans Nazis and the Republicans coming up with timid responses. Also, I get sick of reading about some of these Republicans who are "under Hillary's spell." Give me a break!
To: Aquinasfan
She's being elegantly eruditely true to the truth. She's wonderful.
She's right in asking that question.
Just what was the true motivation for so much unquestioned support given to Clinton as he embarked unchallenged on a 78 day bombing campaign against a sovereign nation, Serbia, while many of these same democrat leaders are showing their mulish perdigree towards President Bush, who incidently has a proven track record of honor, dignity, and integrity not that such sterling attributes would influence democrat party leaders to support President Bush on this very critical mission to protect, defend and preserve our Constitution, nation's security and people?
26
posted on
09/27/2002 7:36:48 PM PDT
by
harpo11
To: Aquinasfan
Ann mopped the floor with Colmes. He was visibly shaken. His face was red. It was pathetic. Colmes is not one of the evil "Liberals"; he's one of the stupid "Liberals", but in the long run they are more dangerous.
To: Savage Beast
To: Paul Atreides
I am trying to remember. Where did Bob Dole come down on this during the election?
To: Paul Atreides
""under Hillary's spell." LOL!!
I agree, "give me a break". Who wrote, when written, and why, in The Code of Ethics Book for Republicans that they must politely back off, and/or resist coming out swinging in the defense of the truth? Are liberal/socialists/democrats/enviro-nazi's/tree-huggers/commie-sympathizers/species covered under endangered species act higher class of citizenship than Republicans?
It seems to me pathetic and unwise that many republicans behave as if they were relegated to the lower echelons of society.
I say if you got the truth, flaunt it.
30
posted on
09/27/2002 7:53:15 PM PDT
by
harpo11
To: Paul Atreides
...just when I thought it wasn't possible for Alan Colmes to look more grotesque....you go and post that! gag!
31
posted on
09/27/2002 7:53:43 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: Liberty Teeth
I remember something happened during a debate with Dole and Bubba. Dole brought up something about Clinton, it could have been his honesty or something, and Dole was challenged on it. He started fumbling around and backtracking. All I could think was "Don't bring it up if you're not going to stick to it."
To: Paul Atreides
LOL!!! Close but, hey, come on, you made him look too good!
just kidding...your pic is great.
33
posted on
09/27/2002 7:55:31 PM PDT
by
harpo11
To: harpo11
All we heard about during the Bubba years was "the politics of personal destruction." It was if they had a trained parrot continually repeating that phrase on the telly. Yet, they are the masters of that tactic!
To: Jorge
Just be thankful I didn't give him a Clinton body.
To: Paul Atreides
Alan looks better than I've ever seen him look.
To: Aquinasfan
Gore has hillary hips.
37
posted on
09/27/2002 8:20:48 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
To: Paleo Conservative
Re:
This is post #17. Remember the Ann Coulter rule? I'm so ashamed. please forgive.
38
posted on
09/27/2002 8:22:35 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
To: Paul Atreides
That's great picture. Almost looks natural.
Now all you need is a shot with Jerrod Nadlers head on Jabba next to him.
Has Alan Colmes askes a pertinent question since 9/11?
I watch the show almost every night and I'll been waiting for for to ask one.
39
posted on
09/27/2002 8:24:06 PM PDT
by
JZoback
To: Aquinasfan
Kick him again, Ann. LOL
- Gin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson